From 0e6513050f92ee44064d2e89f0f8dc8ba7b99589 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Kazuhiko Shiozaki <kazuhiko@nexedi.com> Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 06:34:58 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] some checks for applied payment simulation rule. git-svn-id: https://svn.erp5.org/repos/public/erp5/trunk@32992 20353a03-c40f-0410-a6d1-a30d3c3de9de --- product/ERP5/tests/testAccountingRules.py | 17 ++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/product/ERP5/tests/testAccountingRules.py b/product/ERP5/tests/testAccountingRules.py index 850d26ba3a..d2fdd783a6 100644 --- a/product/ERP5/tests/testAccountingRules.py +++ b/product/ERP5/tests/testAccountingRules.py @@ -1232,7 +1232,22 @@ class TestAccountingRules(TestAccountingRulesMixin, ERP5TypeTestCase): def stepCheckPaymentRuleIsApplied(self, sequence, **kw) : """ checks that a payment rule is applied for the total amount of receivable """ - # TODO + invoice_line = sequence.get('invoice_line') + simulation_movement = invoice_line.getDeliveryRelatedValue() + applied_rule_list = simulation_movement.objectValues() + # Invoice Transaction Rule and Trade Model Rule + self.assertEquals(2, len(applied_rule_list)) + applied_rule = [x for x in applied_rule_list \ + if x.getSpecialiseReference() == \ + 'default_invoice_transaction_rule'][0] + simulation_movement_list = [x for x in applied_rule.objectValues() \ + if x.getSourceTitle() in ('Receivable', + 'Payable')] + self.assertEquals(1, len(simulation_movement_list)) + simulation_movement = simulation_movement_list[0] + applied_rule_list = simulation_movement.objectValues() + self.assertEquals(1, len(applied_rule_list)) + payment_applied_rule = applied_rule_list[0] def stepPlanInvoice(self, sequence, **kw) : """ put the invoice in the `planned` state, which will -- 2.30.9