From e8195b944682e189bf2c97178f64f0d405285f15 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Sebastien Robin <seb@nexedi.com> Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2005 07:26:04 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] we must not assume that we always have the getSimulationState method git-svn-id: https://svn.erp5.org/repos/public/erp5/trunk@2949 20353a03-c40f-0410-a6d1-a30d3c3de9de --- product/ERP5/Document/OrderLine.py | 8 +++++--- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/product/ERP5/Document/OrderLine.py b/product/ERP5/Document/OrderLine.py index 187572bfc3..068e2755e7 100755 --- a/product/ERP5/Document/OrderLine.py +++ b/product/ERP5/Document/OrderLine.py @@ -107,9 +107,11 @@ class OrderLine(DeliveryLine): (Called when the object is created or moved.) """ DeliveryLine.manage_afterAdd(self, item, container) - if self.aq_parent.getSimulationState() not in self.getPortalDraftOrderStateList(): - # Only reexpand order rule when we add lines - self.aq_parent.activate()._createOrderRule() + # Make sure we have a workflow with the variable name 'simulation_state' + if getattr(self.getParent(),'getSimulationState'): + if self.getParent().getSimulationState() not in self.getPortalDraftOrderStateList(): + # Only reexpand order rule when we add lines + self.aq_parent.activate()._createOrderRule() # Simulation Consistency Check def getSimulationQuantity(self): -- 2.30.9