git-backup: Initial draft
This program backups files and set of bare Git repositories into one Git repository. Files are copied to blobs and then added to tree under certain place, and for Git repositories, all reachable objects are pulled in with maintaining index which remembers reference -> sha1 for every pulled repositories. After objects from backuped Git repositories are pulled in, we create new commit which references tree with changed backup index and files, and also has all head objects from pulled-in repositories in its parents(*). This way backup has history and all pulled objects become reachable from single head commit in backup repository. In particular that means that the whole state of backup can be described with only single sha1, and that backup repository itself could be synchronized via standard git pull/push, be repacked, etc. Restoration process is the opposite - from a particular backup state, files are extracted at a proper place, and for Git repositories a pack with all objects reachable from that repository heads is prepared and extracted from backup repository object database. This approach allows to leverage Git's good ability for object contents deduplication and packing, especially for cases when there are many hosted repositories which are forks of each other with relatively minor changes in between each other and over time, and mostly common base. In author experience the size of backup is dramatically smaller compared to straightforward "let's tar it all" approach. Data for all backuped files and repositories can be accessed if one has access to backup repository, so either they all should be in the same security domain, or extra care has to be taken to protect access to backup repository. File permissions are not managed with strict details due to inherent nature of Git. This aspect can be improved with e.g. etckeeper-like (http://etckeeper.branchable.com/) approach if needed. Please see README.txt with user-level overview on how to use git-backup. NOTE the idea of pulling all refs together is similar to git-namespaces http://git-scm.com/docs/gitnamespaces (*) Tag objects are handled specially - because in a lot of places Git insists and assumes commit parents can only be commit objects. We encode tag objects in specially-crafted commit object on pull, and decode back on backup restore. We do likewise if a ref points to tree or blob, which is valid in Git.
Showing
COPYING
0 → 100644
README.txt
0 → 100644
git-backup
0 → 100755
Please register or sign in to comment