Commit 49ccd7b9 authored by Tim Peters's avatar Tim Peters

Changed the msg generated when an oid isn't found.

parent f3348757
......@@ -44,11 +44,11 @@ There's not a lot interesting in an empty DB!
>>> t.run()
>>> t.report()
oid 0x00 <unknown> 0 revisions
this oid was neither defined nor referenced
this oid was not defined (no data record for it found)
oid 0x01 <unknown> 0 revisions
this oid was neither defined nor referenced
this oid was not defined (no data record for it found)
oid 0x123456 <unknown> 0 revisions
this oid was neither defined nor referenced
this oid was not defined (no data record for it found)
That didn't tell us much, but does show that the specified oids are sorted
into increasing order.
......@@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ oid 0x00 persistent.mapping.PersistentMapping 1 revision
tid description='initial database creation'
new revision persistent.mapping.PersistentMapping at 52
oid 0x01 <unknown> 0 revisions
this oid was neither defined nor referenced
this oid was not defined (no data record for it found)
So we see oid 0 has been used in our one transaction, and that it was created
there, and is a PersistentMapping. 4 is the file offset to the start of the
......@@ -151,7 +151,7 @@ oid 0x01 BTrees._OOBTree.OOBTree 2 revisions
new revision BTrees._OOBTree.OOBTree at 491
references 0x00 <unknown> at 491
oid 0x02 <unknown> 0 revisions
this oid was neither defined nor referenced
this oid was not defined (no data record for it found)
Note that we didn't create any new object there (oid 2 is still unused), we
just made oid 1 refer to oid 0. Therefore there's a new "new revision" line
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment