Commit 5f199f2d authored by Dominik Honnef's avatar Dominik Honnef Committed by Brad Fitzpatrick

misc/emacs: when defining prog-mode, define it like GNU Emacs 24 would

Fixes #6156.

R=adonovan
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/13035043
parent b1d64f20
......@@ -67,14 +67,14 @@
(defun go--old-completion-list-style (list)
(mapcar (lambda (x) (cons x nil)) list))
;; GNU Emacs 24 has prog-mode, older GNU Emacs and XEmacs do not.
;; Ideally we'd use defalias instead, but that breaks in XEmacs.
;;
;; TODO: If XEmacs decides to add prog-mode, change this to use
;; defalias to alias prog-mode or fundamental-mode to go--prog-mode
;; and use that in define-derived-mode.
;; GNU Emacs 24 has prog-mode, older GNU Emacs and XEmacs do not, so
;; copy its definition for those.
(if (not (fboundp 'prog-mode))
(define-derived-mode prog-mode fundamental-mode "" ""))
(define-derived-mode prog-mode fundamental-mode "Prog"
"Major mode for editing source code."
(set (make-local-variable 'require-final-newline) mode-require-final-newline)
(set (make-local-variable 'parse-sexp-ignore-comments) t)
(setq bidi-paragraph-direction 'left-to-right)))
(defun go--regexp-enclose-in-symbol (s)
;; XEmacs does not support \_<, GNU Emacs does. In GNU Emacs we make
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment