Commit a9407b57 authored by Ian Lance Taylor's avatar Ian Lance Taylor

cmd/compile: fix varexpr handling of ODOT

For a long time varexpr has handled ODOT incorrectly: it has always
returned false.  Before https://golang.org/cl/20890 this has been
because an ODOT had a Right field with an ONAME with no Class, for which
varexpr returns false.  CL 20890 preserved the behavior of varexpr for
ODOT, so that the change would pass toolstash -cmp.

This CL fixes varexpr so that ODOT can return true in some cases.  This
breaks toolstash -cmp.  While the changed compiler allocates temporary
variables in a different order, I have not been able to find any
examples where the generated code is different, other than using
different stack offsets and, in some cases, registers.  It seems that
other parts of the compiler will force the ODOT into a temporary anyhow.

Still, this change is clearly correct, and is a minor compiler cleanup.

Change-Id: I71506877aa3c13966bb03c281aa16271ee7fe80a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/20907
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: default avatarDavid Crawshaw <crawshaw@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
parent 93098de0
...@@ -2487,10 +2487,7 @@ func varexpr(n *Node) bool { ...@@ -2487,10 +2487,7 @@ func varexpr(n *Node) bool {
return varexpr(n.Left) && varexpr(n.Right) return varexpr(n.Left) && varexpr(n.Right)
case ODOT: // but not ODOTPTR case ODOT: // but not ODOTPTR
// The original code always returned false for ODOT, return varexpr(n.Left)
// because n.Right would be an ONAME with n.Class not set.
// TODO(iant): Fix this to remove "&& false".
return varexpr(n.Left) && false
} }
// Be conservative. // Be conservative.
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment