-
Vlastimil Babka authored
We currently use preempt_disable() (directly or via get_cpu_ptr()) to stabilize the pointer to kmem_cache_cpu. On PREEMPT_RT this would be incompatible with the list_lock spinlock. We can use migrate_disable() instead, but that increases overhead on !PREEMPT_RT as it's an unconditional function call. In order to get the best available mechanism on both PREEMPT_RT and !PREEMPT_RT, introduce private slub_get_cpu_ptr() and slub_put_cpu_ptr() wrappers and use them. Signed-off-by:
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
25c00c50