-
Fu Wei authored
Currently, the arch timer driver uses ARCH_TIMER_PHYS_SECURE_PPI to mean the driver will use the secure PPI *and* potentially also use the non-secure PPI. This is somewhat confusing. For arm64 it never makes sense to use the secure PPI, but we do anyway, inheriting this behaviour from 32-bit arm. For ACPI, we may not even have a valid secure PPI, so we need to be able to only request the non-secure PPI. To that end, this patch reworks the timer driver so that we can request the non-secure PPI alone. The PPI selection is split out into a new function, arch_timer_select_ppi(), and verification of the selected PPI is shifted out to callers (as DT may select the PPI by other means and must handle this anyway). We now consistently use arch_timer_has_nonsecure_ppi() to determine whether we must manage a non-secure PPI *in addition* to a secure PPI. When we only have a non-secure PPI, this returns false. Signed-off-by: Fu Wei <fu.wei@linaro.org> Tested-by: Xiongfeng Wang <wangxiongfeng2@huawei.com> [Mark: reword commit message] Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
4502b6bb