Remove ZRAM's enforced "huge object" value and use zsmalloc huge-class
watermark instead, which makes more sense.

TEST
- I used a 1G zram device, LZO compression back-end, original
  data set size was 444MB. Looking at zsmalloc classes stats the
  test ended up to be pretty fair.

BASE ZRAM/ZSMALLOC
=====================
zram mm_stat

498978816 191482495 199831552        0 199831552    15634        0

zsmalloc classes

 class  size almost_full almost_empty obj_allocated   obj_used pages_used pages_per_zspage freeable
...
   151  2448           0            0          1240       1240        744                3        0
   168  2720           0            0          4200       4200       2800                2        0
   190  3072           0            0         10100      10100       7575                3        0
   202  3264           0            0           380        380        304                4        0
   254  4096           0            0         10620      10620      10620                1        0

 Total                 7           46        106982     106187      48787                         0

PATCHED ZRAM/ZSMALLOC
=====================

zram mm_stat

498978816 182579184 194248704        0 194248704    15628        0

zsmalloc classes

 class  size almost_full almost_empty obj_allocated   obj_used pages_used pages_per_zspage freeable
...
   151  2448           0            0          1240       1240        744                3        0
   168  2720           0            0          4200       4200       2800                2        0
   190  3072           0            0         10100      10100       7575                3        0
   202  3264           0            0          7180       7180       5744                4        0
   254  4096           0            0          3820       3820       3820                1        0

 Total                 8           45        106959     106193      47424                         0

As we can see, we reduced the number of objects stored in class-4096,
because a huge number of objects which we previously forcibly stored in
class-4096 now stored in non-huge class-3264.  This results in lower
memory consumption:

- zsmalloc now uses 47424 physical pages, which is less than 48787 pages
  zsmalloc used before.

- objects that we store in class-3264 share zspages.  That's why overall
  the number of pages that both class-4096 and class-3264 consumed went
  down from 10924 to 9564.

[sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com: add pool param to zs_huge_class_size()]
  Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180314081833.1096-3-sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180306070639.7389-3-sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.comSigned-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>