-
Vladimir Oltean authored
The difference between dsa_is_user_port and dsa_port_is_user is that the former needs to look up the list of ports of the DSA switch tree in order to find the struct dsa_port, while the latter directly receives it as an argument. dsa_is_user_port is already in widespread use and has its place, so there isn't any chance of converting all callers to a single form. But being able to do: dsa_port_is_user(dp) instead of dsa_is_user_port(dp->ds, dp->index) is much more efficient too, especially when the "dp" comes from an iterator over the DSA switch tree - this reduces the complexity from quadratic to linear. Move these helpers from dsa2.c to include/net/dsa.h so that others can use them too. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
a8986681