-
Vlad Yasevich authored
Macvlan devices try to avoid stacking, but that's not always successfull or even desired. As an example, the following configuration is perefectly legal and valid: eth0 <--- macvlan0 <---- vlan0.10 <--- macvlan1 However, this configuration produces the following lockdep trace: [ 115.620418] ====================================================== [ 115.620477] [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ] [ 115.620516] 3.15.0-rc1+ #24 Not tainted [ 115.620540] ------------------------------------------------------- [ 115.620577] ip/1704 is trying to acquire lock: [ 115.620604] (&vlan_netdev_addr_lock_key/1){+.....}, at: [<ffffffff815df49c>] dev_uc_sync+0x3c/0x80 [ 115.620686] but task is already holding lock: [ 115.620723] (&macvlan_netdev_addr_lock_key){+.....}, at: [<ffffffff815da5be>] dev_set_rx_mode+0x1e/0x40 [ 115.620795] which lock already depends on the new lock. [ 115.620853] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: [ 115.620894] -> #1 (&macvlan_netdev_addr_lock_key){+.....}: [ 115.620935] [<ffffffff810d57f2>] lock_acquire+0xa2/0x130 [ 115.620974] [<ffffffff816f62e7>] _raw_spin_lock_nested+0x37/0x50 [ 115.621019] [<ffffffffa07296c3>] vlan_dev_set_rx_mode+0x53/0x110 [8021q] [ 115.621066] [<ffffffff815da557>] __dev_set_rx_mode+0x57/0xa0 [ 115.621105] [<ffffffff815da5c6>] dev_set_rx_mode+0x26/0x40 [ 115.621143] [<ffffffff815da6be>] __dev_open+0xde/0x140 [ 115.621174] [<ffffffff815da9ad>] __dev_change_flags+0x9d/0x170 [ 115.621174] [<ffffffff815daaa9>] dev_change_flags+0x29/0x60 [ 115.621174] [<ffffffff815e7f11>] do_setlink+0x321/0x9a0 [ 115.621174] [<ffffffff815ea59f>] rtnl_newlink+0x51f/0x730 [ 115.621174] [<ffffffff815e6e75>] rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x95/0x250 [ 115.621174] [<ffffffff81608b19>] netlink_rcv_skb+0xa9/0xc0 [ 115.621174] [<ffffffff815e6dca>] rtnetlink_rcv+0x2a/0x40 [ 115.621174] [<ffffffff81608150>] netlink_unicast+0xf0/0x1c0 [ 115.621174] [<ffffffff8160851f>] netlink_sendmsg+0x2ff/0x740 [ 115.621174] [<ffffffff815bc9db>] sock_sendmsg+0x8b/0xc0 [ 115.621174] [<ffffffff815bd4b9>] ___sys_sendmsg+0x369/0x380 [ 115.621174] [<ffffffff815bdbb2>] __sys_sendmsg+0x42/0x80 [ 115.621174] [<ffffffff815bdc02>] SyS_sendmsg+0x12/0x20 [ 115.621174] [<ffffffff816ffd69>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b [ 115.621174] -> #0 (&vlan_netdev_addr_lock_key/1){+.....}: [ 115.621174] [<ffffffff810d4d43>] __lock_acquire+0x1773/0x1a60 [ 115.621174] [<ffffffff810d57f2>] lock_acquire+0xa2/0x130 [ 115.621174] [<ffffffff816f62e7>] _raw_spin_lock_nested+0x37/0x50 [ 115.621174] [<ffffffff815df49c>] dev_uc_sync+0x3c/0x80 [ 115.621174] [<ffffffffa0696d2a>] macvlan_set_mac_lists+0xca/0x110 [macvlan] [ 115.621174] [<ffffffff815da557>] __dev_set_rx_mode+0x57/0xa0 [ 115.621174] [<ffffffff815da5c6>] dev_set_rx_mode+0x26/0x40 [ 115.621174] [<ffffffff815da6be>] __dev_open+0xde/0x140 [ 115.621174] [<ffffffff815da9ad>] __dev_change_flags+0x9d/0x170 [ 115.621174] [<ffffffff815daaa9>] dev_change_flags+0x29/0x60 [ 115.621174] [<ffffffff815e7f11>] do_setlink+0x321/0x9a0 [ 115.621174] [<ffffffff815ea59f>] rtnl_newlink+0x51f/0x730 [ 115.621174] [<ffffffff815e6e75>] rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x95/0x250 [ 115.621174] [<ffffffff81608b19>] netlink_rcv_skb+0xa9/0xc0 [ 115.621174] [<ffffffff815e6dca>] rtnetlink_rcv+0x2a/0x40 [ 115.621174] [<ffffffff81608150>] netlink_unicast+0xf0/0x1c0 [ 115.621174] [<ffffffff8160851f>] netlink_sendmsg+0x2ff/0x740 [ 115.621174] [<ffffffff815bc9db>] sock_sendmsg+0x8b/0xc0 [ 115.621174] [<ffffffff815bd4b9>] ___sys_sendmsg+0x369/0x380 [ 115.621174] [<ffffffff815bdbb2>] __sys_sendmsg+0x42/0x80 [ 115.621174] [<ffffffff815bdc02>] SyS_sendmsg+0x12/0x20 [ 115.621174] [<ffffffff816ffd69>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b [ 115.621174] other info that might help us debug this: [ 115.621174] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 115.621174] CPU0 CPU1 [ 115.621174] ---- ---- [ 115.621174] lock(&macvlan_netdev_addr_lock_key); [ 115.621174] lock(&vlan_netdev_addr_lock_key/1); [ 115.621174] lock(&macvlan_netdev_addr_lock_key); [ 115.621174] lock(&vlan_netdev_addr_lock_key/1); [ 115.621174] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 115.621174] 2 locks held by ip/1704: [ 115.621174] #0: (rtnl_mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff815e6dbb>] rtnetlink_rcv+0x1b/0x40 [ 115.621174] #1: (&macvlan_netdev_addr_lock_key){+.....}, at: [<ffffffff815da5be>] dev_set_rx_mode+0x1e/0x40 [ 115.621174] stack backtrace: [ 115.621174] CPU: 3 PID: 1704 Comm: ip Not tainted 3.15.0-rc1+ #24 [ 115.621174] Hardware name: Hewlett-Packard HP xw8400 Workstation/0A08h, BIOS 786D5 v02.38 10/25/2010 [ 115.621174] ffffffff82339ae0 ffff880465f79568 ffffffff816ee20c ffffffff82339ae0 [ 115.621174] ffff880465f795a8 ffffffff816e9e1b ffff880465f79600 ffff880465b019c8 [ 115.621174] 0000000000000001 0000000000000002 ffff880465b019c8 ffff880465b01230 [ 115.621174] Call Trace: [ 115.621174] [<ffffffff816ee20c>] dump_stack+0x4d/0x66 [ 115.621174] [<ffffffff816e9e1b>] print_circular_bug+0x200/0x20e [ 115.621174] [<ffffffff810d4d43>] __lock_acquire+0x1773/0x1a60 [ 115.621174] [<ffffffff810d3172>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0xb2/0x1d0 [ 115.621174] [<ffffffff810d57f2>] lock_acquire+0xa2/0x130 [ 115.621174] [<ffffffff815df49c>] ? dev_uc_sync+0x3c/0x80 [ 115.621174] [<ffffffff816f62e7>] _raw_spin_lock_nested+0x37/0x50 [ 115.621174] [<ffffffff815df49c>] ? dev_uc_sync+0x3c/0x80 [ 115.621174] [<ffffffff815df49c>] dev_uc_sync+0x3c/0x80 [ 115.621174] [<ffffffffa0696d2a>] macvlan_set_mac_lists+0xca/0x110 [macvlan] [ 115.621174] [<ffffffff815da557>] __dev_set_rx_mode+0x57/0xa0 [ 115.621174] [<ffffffff815da5c6>] dev_set_rx_mode+0x26/0x40 [ 115.621174] [<ffffffff815da6be>] __dev_open+0xde/0x140 [ 115.621174] [<ffffffff815da9ad>] __dev_change_flags+0x9d/0x170 [ 115.621174] [<ffffffff815daaa9>] dev_change_flags+0x29/0x60 [ 115.621174] [<ffffffff811e1db1>] ? mem_cgroup_bad_page_check+0x21/0x30 [ 115.621174] [<ffffffff815e7f11>] do_setlink+0x321/0x9a0 [ 115.621174] [<ffffffff810d394c>] ? __lock_acquire+0x37c/0x1a60 [ 115.621174] [<ffffffff815ea59f>] rtnl_newlink+0x51f/0x730 [ 115.621174] [<ffffffff815ea169>] ? rtnl_newlink+0xe9/0x730 [ 115.621174] [<ffffffff815e6e75>] rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x95/0x250 [ 115.621174] [<ffffffff810d329d>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xd/0x10 [ 115.621174] [<ffffffff815e6dbb>] ? rtnetlink_rcv+0x1b/0x40 [ 115.621174] [<ffffffff815e6de0>] ? rtnetlink_rcv+0x40/0x40 [ 115.621174] [<ffffffff81608b19>] netlink_rcv_skb+0xa9/0xc0 [ 115.621174] [<ffffffff815e6dca>] rtnetlink_rcv+0x2a/0x40 [ 115.621174] [<ffffffff81608150>] netlink_unicast+0xf0/0x1c0 [ 115.621174] [<ffffffff8160851f>] netlink_sendmsg+0x2ff/0x740 [ 115.621174] [<ffffffff815bc9db>] sock_sendmsg+0x8b/0xc0 [ 115.621174] [<ffffffff8119d4af>] ? might_fault+0x5f/0xb0 [ 115.621174] [<ffffffff8119d4f8>] ? might_fault+0xa8/0xb0 [ 115.621174] [<ffffffff8119d4af>] ? might_fault+0x5f/0xb0 [ 115.621174] [<ffffffff815cb51e>] ? verify_iovec+0x5e/0xe0 [ 115.621174] [<ffffffff815bd4b9>] ___sys_sendmsg+0x369/0x380 [ 115.621174] [<ffffffff816faa0d>] ? __do_page_fault+0x11d/0x570 [ 115.621174] [<ffffffff810cfe9f>] ? up_read+0x1f/0x40 [ 115.621174] [<ffffffff816fab04>] ? __do_page_fault+0x214/0x570 [ 115.621174] [<ffffffff8120a10b>] ? mntput_no_expire+0x6b/0x1c0 [ 115.621174] [<ffffffff8120a0b7>] ? mntput_no_expire+0x17/0x1c0 [ 115.621174] [<ffffffff8120a284>] ? mntput+0x24/0x40 [ 115.621174] [<ffffffff815bdbb2>] __sys_sendmsg+0x42/0x80 [ 115.621174] [<ffffffff815bdc02>] SyS_sendmsg+0x12/0x20 [ 115.621174] [<ffffffff816ffd69>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b Fix this by correctly providing macvlan lockdep class. Signed-off-by: Vlad Yasevich <vyasevic@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
c674ac30