• Jan Kara's avatar
    writeback: Remove wb->list_lock from writeback_single_inode() · f0d07b7f
    Jan Kara authored
    writeback_single_inode() doesn't need wb->list_lock for anything on entry now.
    So remove the requirement. This makes locking of writeback_single_inode()
    temporarily awkward (entering with i_lock, returning with i_lock and
    wb->list_lock) but it will be sanitized in the next patch.
    
    Also inode_wait_for_writeback() doesn't need wb->list_lock for anything. It was
    just taking it to make usage convenient for callers but with
    writeback_single_inode() changing it's not very convenient anymore. So remove
    the lock from that function.
    Reviewed-by: default avatarChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
    Signed-off-by: default avatarJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
    Signed-off-by: default avatarFengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
    f0d07b7f
fs-writeback.c 37.1 KB