-
Stephen Boyd authored
A problem was reported on CoachZ devices where the display wouldn't come up, or it would be distorted. It turns out that the PLL code here wasn't getting called once dsi_pll_10nm_vco_recalc_rate() started returning the same exact frequency, down to the Hz, that the bootloader was setting instead of 0 when the clk was registered with the clk framework. After commit 001d8dc3 ("drm/msm/dsi: remove temp data from global pll structure") we use a hardcoded value for the parent clk frequency, i.e. VCO_REF_CLK_RATE, and we also hardcode the value for FRAC_BITS, instead of getting it from the config structure. This combination of changes to the recalc function allows us to properly calculate the frequency of the PLL regardless of whether or not the PLL has been clk_prepare()d or clk_set_rate()d. That's a good improvement. Unfortunately, this means that now we won't call down into the PLL clk driver when we call clk_set_rate() because the frequency calculated in the framework matches the frequency that is set in hardware. If the rate is the same as what we want it should be OK to not call the set_rate PLL op. The real problem is that the prepare op in this driver uses a private struct member to stash away the vco frequency so that it can call the set_rate op directly during prepare. Once the set_rate op is never called because recalc_rate told us the rate is the same, we don't set this private struct member before the prepare op runs, so we try to call the set_rate function directly with a frequency of 0. This effectively kills the PLL and configures it for a rate that won't work. Calling set_rate from prepare is really quite bad and will confuse any downstream clks about what the rate actually is of their parent. Fixing that will be a rather large change though so we leave that to later. For now, let's stash away the rate we calculate during recalc so that the prepare op knows what frequency to set, instead of 0. This way things keep working and the display can enable the PLL properly. In the future, we should remove that code from the prepare op so that it doesn't even try to call the set rate function. Cc: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org> Cc: Abhinav Kumar <abhinavk@codeaurora.org> Fixes: 001d8dc3 ("drm/msm/dsi: remove temp data from global pll structure") Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210608195519.125561-1-swboyd@chromium.orgSigned-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>
170b7635