Up until now, each TX ring always requires a completion ring/NQ/MSIX.
bnxt_trim_rings() and the assignment of bp->cp_nr_rings always make
this assumption.  This will no longer be true in the next patches, so
we refactor and add helper functions to determine the proper relationship
between TX rings and the required completion ring/NQ/MSIX.  This patch
does not change the 1:1 relationship yet.

Note that on P5 chips, each RX and TX ring still requires a completion
ring.  Only the number of NQs has been reduced.  We should no longer call
bnxt_trim_rings() to adjust the RX and TX rings on P5 chips.  Replace with
simple logic to check that RX + TX < CP and adjust accordingly.

bnxt_check_rings() should call _bnxt_get_max_rings() to get the raw
number of rings instead of bnxt_get_max_rings().  If we are about to
create TCs, bnxt_get_max_rings() would not be able to calculate the max
rings correctly.
Reviewed-by: Andy Gospodarek <andrew.gospodarek@broadcom.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Chan <michael.chan@broadcom.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>