The 'choice' statement is primarily used to exclusively select one
option, but the 'optional' property allows all entries to be disabled.

In the following example, both A and B can be disabled simultaneously:

    choice
            prompt "choose A, B, or nothing"
            optional

    config A
            bool "A"

    config B
            bool "B"

    endchoice

You can achieve the equivalent outcome by other means.

A common solution is to add another option to guard the choice block.
In the following example, you can set ENABLE_A_B_CHOICE=n to disable
the entire choice block:

    choice
            prompt "choose A or B"
            depends on ENABLE_A_B_CHOICE

    config A
            bool "A"

    config B
            bool "B"

    endchoice

Another approach is to insert one more entry:

    choice
            prompt "choose A, B, or disable both"

    config A
            bool "A"

    config B
            bool "B"

    config DISABLE_A_AND_B
            bool "choose this to disable both A and B"

    endchoice

Some real examples are DEBUG_INFO_NONE, INITRAMFS_COMPRESSION_NONE,
LTO_NONE, etc.

The 'optional' property is even more unnecessary for a tristate choice.

Without the 'optional' property, you can disable A and B; you can set
'm' in the choice prompt, and disable A and B individually:

    choice
            prompt "choose one built-in or make them modular"

    config A
            tristate "A"

    config B
            tristate "B"

    endchoice

In conclusion, the 'optional' property was unneeded.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Nicolas Schier <n.schier@avm.de>