Commit 00c611de authored by Rafael J. Wysocki's avatar Rafael J. Wysocki

Revert "ACPI 2.0 / AML: Improve module level execution by moving the...

Revert "ACPI 2.0 / AML: Improve module level execution by moving the If/Else/While execution to per-table basis"

Revert commit 3d4b7ae9 (ACPI 2.0 / AML: Improve module level
execution by moving the If/Else/While execution to per-table basis)
that enabled the execution of module-level AML after loading each
table (rather than after all AML tables have been loaded), but
overlooked locking issues resulting from that change.

Fixes: 3d4b7ae9 (ACPI 2.0 / AML: Improve module level execution by moving the If/Else/While execution to per-table basis)
Reported-by: default avatarMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
parent ffd8d618
...@@ -192,7 +192,7 @@ ACPI_INIT_GLOBAL(u8, acpi_gbl_do_not_use_xsdt, FALSE); ...@@ -192,7 +192,7 @@ ACPI_INIT_GLOBAL(u8, acpi_gbl_do_not_use_xsdt, FALSE);
/* /*
* Optionally support group module level code. * Optionally support group module level code.
*/ */
ACPI_INIT_GLOBAL(u8, acpi_gbl_group_module_level_code, FALSE); ACPI_INIT_GLOBAL(u8, acpi_gbl_group_module_level_code, TRUE);
/* /*
* Optionally use 32-bit FADT addresses if and when there is a conflict * Optionally use 32-bit FADT addresses if and when there is a conflict
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment