Commit 02cdeace authored by Maxime Ripard's avatar Maxime Ripard Committed by Stephen Boyd

clk: tests: Add tests for single parent mux

We have a few tests for a mux with a single parent, testing the case
where it used to be orphan.

Let's leverage most of the code but register the clock properly to test
a few trivial things.

Tested-by: Alexander Stein <alexander.stein@ew.tq-group.com> # imx8mp
Tested-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com> # exynos4210, meson g12b
Signed-off-by: default avatarMaxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220816112530.1837489-10-maxime@cerno.techTested-by: default avatarLinux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>
Tested-by: default avatarNaresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarStephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
parent 350575ab
...@@ -365,6 +365,189 @@ struct clk_single_parent_ctx { ...@@ -365,6 +365,189 @@ struct clk_single_parent_ctx {
struct clk_hw hw; struct clk_hw hw;
}; };
static int clk_single_parent_mux_test_init(struct kunit *test)
{
struct clk_single_parent_ctx *ctx;
int ret;
ctx = kunit_kzalloc(test, sizeof(*ctx), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!ctx)
return -ENOMEM;
test->priv = ctx;
ctx->parent_ctx.rate = DUMMY_CLOCK_INIT_RATE;
ctx->parent_ctx.hw.init =
CLK_HW_INIT_NO_PARENT("parent-clk",
&clk_dummy_rate_ops,
0);
ret = clk_hw_register(NULL, &ctx->parent_ctx.hw);
if (ret)
return ret;
ctx->hw.init = CLK_HW_INIT("test-clk", "parent-clk",
&clk_dummy_single_parent_ops,
CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT);
ret = clk_hw_register(NULL, &ctx->hw);
if (ret)
return ret;
return 0;
}
static void
clk_single_parent_mux_test_exit(struct kunit *test)
{
struct clk_single_parent_ctx *ctx = test->priv;
clk_hw_unregister(&ctx->hw);
clk_hw_unregister(&ctx->parent_ctx.hw);
}
/*
* Test that for a clock with a single parent, clk_get_parent() actually
* returns the parent.
*/
static void
clk_test_single_parent_mux_get_parent(struct kunit *test)
{
struct clk_single_parent_ctx *ctx = test->priv;
struct clk_hw *hw = &ctx->hw;
struct clk *clk = clk_hw_get_clk(hw, NULL);
struct clk *parent = clk_hw_get_clk(&ctx->parent_ctx.hw, NULL);
KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, clk_is_match(clk_get_parent(clk), parent));
clk_put(parent);
clk_put(clk);
}
/*
* Test that for a clock that can't modify its rate and with a single
* parent, if we set disjoints range on the parent and then the child,
* the second will return an error.
*
* FIXME: clk_set_rate_range() only considers the current clock when
* evaluating whether ranges are disjoints and not the upstream clocks
* ranges.
*/
static void
clk_test_single_parent_mux_set_range_disjoint_child_last(struct kunit *test)
{
struct clk_single_parent_ctx *ctx = test->priv;
struct clk_hw *hw = &ctx->hw;
struct clk *clk = clk_hw_get_clk(hw, NULL);
struct clk *parent;
int ret;
kunit_skip(test, "This needs to be fixed in the core.");
parent = clk_get_parent(clk);
KUNIT_ASSERT_PTR_NE(test, parent, NULL);
ret = clk_set_rate_range(parent, 1000, 2000);
KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0);
ret = clk_set_rate_range(clk, 3000, 4000);
KUNIT_EXPECT_LT(test, ret, 0);
clk_put(clk);
}
/*
* Test that for a clock that can't modify its rate and with a single
* parent, if we set disjoints range on the child and then the parent,
* the second will return an error.
*
* FIXME: clk_set_rate_range() only considers the current clock when
* evaluating whether ranges are disjoints and not the downstream clocks
* ranges.
*/
static void
clk_test_single_parent_mux_set_range_disjoint_parent_last(struct kunit *test)
{
struct clk_single_parent_ctx *ctx = test->priv;
struct clk_hw *hw = &ctx->hw;
struct clk *clk = clk_hw_get_clk(hw, NULL);
struct clk *parent;
int ret;
kunit_skip(test, "This needs to be fixed in the core.");
parent = clk_get_parent(clk);
KUNIT_ASSERT_PTR_NE(test, parent, NULL);
ret = clk_set_rate_range(clk, 1000, 2000);
KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0);
ret = clk_set_rate_range(parent, 3000, 4000);
KUNIT_EXPECT_LT(test, ret, 0);
clk_put(clk);
}
/*
* Test that for a clock that can't modify its rate and with a single
* parent, if we set a range on the parent and a more restrictive one on
* the child, and then call clk_round_rate(), the boundaries of the
* two clocks are taken into account.
*/
static void
clk_test_single_parent_mux_set_range_round_rate_child_smaller(struct kunit *test)
{
struct clk_single_parent_ctx *ctx = test->priv;
struct clk_hw *hw = &ctx->hw;
struct clk *clk = clk_hw_get_clk(hw, NULL);
struct clk *parent;
unsigned long rate;
int ret;
parent = clk_get_parent(clk);
KUNIT_ASSERT_PTR_NE(test, parent, NULL);
ret = clk_set_rate_range(parent, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_1, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_2);
KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0);
ret = clk_set_rate_range(clk, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_1 + 1000, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_2 - 1000);
KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0);
rate = clk_round_rate(clk, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_1 - 1000);
KUNIT_ASSERT_GT(test, rate, 0);
KUNIT_EXPECT_GE(test, rate, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_1 + 1000);
KUNIT_EXPECT_LE(test, rate, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_2 - 1000);
rate = clk_round_rate(clk, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_2 + 1000);
KUNIT_ASSERT_GT(test, rate, 0);
KUNIT_EXPECT_GE(test, rate, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_1 + 1000);
KUNIT_EXPECT_LE(test, rate, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_2 - 1000);
clk_put(clk);
}
static struct kunit_case clk_single_parent_mux_test_cases[] = {
KUNIT_CASE(clk_test_single_parent_mux_get_parent),
KUNIT_CASE(clk_test_single_parent_mux_set_range_disjoint_child_last),
KUNIT_CASE(clk_test_single_parent_mux_set_range_disjoint_parent_last),
KUNIT_CASE(clk_test_single_parent_mux_set_range_round_rate_child_smaller),
{}
};
/*
* Test suite for a basic mux clock with one parent, with
* CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT on the child.
*
* These tests exercise the consumer API and check that the state of the
* child and parent are sane and consistent.
*/
static struct kunit_suite
clk_single_parent_mux_test_suite = {
.name = "clk-single-parent-mux-test",
.init = clk_single_parent_mux_test_init,
.exit = clk_single_parent_mux_test_exit,
.test_cases = clk_single_parent_mux_test_cases,
};
static int clk_orphan_transparent_single_parent_mux_test_init(struct kunit *test) static int clk_orphan_transparent_single_parent_mux_test_init(struct kunit *test)
{ {
struct clk_single_parent_ctx *ctx; struct clk_single_parent_ctx *ctx;
...@@ -401,14 +584,6 @@ static int clk_orphan_transparent_single_parent_mux_test_init(struct kunit *test ...@@ -401,14 +584,6 @@ static int clk_orphan_transparent_single_parent_mux_test_init(struct kunit *test
return 0; return 0;
} }
static void clk_orphan_transparent_single_parent_mux_test_exit(struct kunit *test)
{
struct clk_single_parent_ctx *ctx = test->priv;
clk_hw_unregister(&ctx->hw);
clk_hw_unregister(&ctx->parent_ctx.hw);
}
/* /*
* Test that a mux-only clock, with an initial rate within a range, * Test that a mux-only clock, with an initial rate within a range,
* will still have the same rate after the range has been enforced. * will still have the same rate after the range has been enforced.
...@@ -455,7 +630,7 @@ static struct kunit_case clk_orphan_transparent_single_parent_mux_test_cases[] = ...@@ -455,7 +630,7 @@ static struct kunit_case clk_orphan_transparent_single_parent_mux_test_cases[] =
static struct kunit_suite clk_orphan_transparent_single_parent_test_suite = { static struct kunit_suite clk_orphan_transparent_single_parent_test_suite = {
.name = "clk-orphan-transparent-single-parent-test", .name = "clk-orphan-transparent-single-parent-test",
.init = clk_orphan_transparent_single_parent_mux_test_init, .init = clk_orphan_transparent_single_parent_mux_test_init,
.exit = clk_orphan_transparent_single_parent_mux_test_exit, .exit = clk_single_parent_mux_test_exit,
.test_cases = clk_orphan_transparent_single_parent_mux_test_cases, .test_cases = clk_orphan_transparent_single_parent_mux_test_cases,
}; };
...@@ -1168,6 +1343,7 @@ kunit_test_suites( ...@@ -1168,6 +1343,7 @@ kunit_test_suites(
&clk_range_test_suite, &clk_range_test_suite,
&clk_range_maximize_test_suite, &clk_range_maximize_test_suite,
&clk_range_minimize_test_suite, &clk_range_minimize_test_suite,
&clk_single_parent_mux_test_suite,
&clk_uncached_test_suite &clk_uncached_test_suite
); );
MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2"); MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment