Commit 043a2d5d authored by Stanislaw Gruszka's avatar Stanislaw Gruszka Committed by Jacek Lawrynowicz

accel/ivpu: Rename cons->rx_msg_lock

Now the cons->rx_msg_lock also protects 'abort' field so rename the lock.
Signed-off-by: default avatarStanislaw Gruszka <stanislaw.gruszka@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarJacek Lawrynowicz <jacek.lawrynowicz@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarJeffrey Hugo <quic_jhugo@quicinc.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20231113170252.758137-2-jacek.lawrynowicz@linux.intel.com
parent 312292a4
......@@ -150,7 +150,7 @@ ivpu_ipc_consumer_add(struct ivpu_device *vdev, struct ivpu_ipc_consumer *cons,
cons->tx_vpu_addr = 0;
cons->request_id = 0;
cons->aborted = false;
spin_lock_init(&cons->rx_msg_lock);
spin_lock_init(&cons->rx_lock);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&cons->rx_msg_list);
init_waitqueue_head(&cons->rx_msg_wq);
......@@ -168,7 +168,7 @@ void ivpu_ipc_consumer_del(struct ivpu_device *vdev, struct ivpu_ipc_consumer *c
list_del(&cons->link);
spin_unlock_irq(&ipc->cons_list_lock);
spin_lock_irq(&cons->rx_msg_lock);
spin_lock_irq(&cons->rx_lock);
list_for_each_entry_safe(rx_msg, r, &cons->rx_msg_list, link) {
list_del(&rx_msg->link);
if (!cons->aborted)
......@@ -176,7 +176,7 @@ void ivpu_ipc_consumer_del(struct ivpu_device *vdev, struct ivpu_ipc_consumer *c
atomic_dec(&ipc->rx_msg_count);
kfree(rx_msg);
}
spin_unlock_irq(&cons->rx_msg_lock);
spin_unlock_irq(&cons->rx_lock);
ivpu_ipc_tx_release(vdev, cons->tx_vpu_addr);
}
......@@ -212,9 +212,9 @@ static int ivpu_ipc_rx_need_wakeup(struct ivpu_ipc_consumer *cons)
if (IS_KTHREAD())
ret |= (kthread_should_stop() || kthread_should_park());
spin_lock_irq(&cons->rx_msg_lock);
spin_lock_irq(&cons->rx_lock);
ret |= !list_empty(&cons->rx_msg_list) || cons->aborted;
spin_unlock_irq(&cons->rx_msg_lock);
spin_unlock_irq(&cons->rx_lock);
return ret;
}
......@@ -237,20 +237,19 @@ int ivpu_ipc_receive(struct ivpu_device *vdev, struct ivpu_ipc_consumer *cons,
if (wait_ret == 0)
return -ETIMEDOUT;
spin_lock_irq(&cons->rx_msg_lock);
spin_lock_irq(&cons->rx_lock);
rx_msg = list_first_entry_or_null(&cons->rx_msg_list, struct ivpu_ipc_rx_msg, link);
if (!rx_msg) {
spin_unlock_irq(&cons->rx_msg_lock);
spin_unlock_irq(&cons->rx_lock);
return -EAGAIN;
}
list_del(&rx_msg->link);
if (cons->aborted) {
spin_unlock_irq(&cons->rx_msg_lock);
spin_unlock_irq(&cons->rx_lock);
ret = -ECANCELED;
goto out;
}
spin_unlock_irq(&cons->rx_msg_lock);
spin_unlock_irq(&cons->rx_lock);
if (ipc_buf)
memcpy(ipc_buf, rx_msg->ipc_hdr, sizeof(*ipc_buf));
......@@ -383,9 +382,9 @@ ivpu_ipc_dispatch(struct ivpu_device *vdev, struct ivpu_ipc_consumer *cons,
rx_msg->ipc_hdr = ipc_hdr;
rx_msg->jsm_msg = jsm_msg;
spin_lock_irqsave(&cons->rx_msg_lock, flags);
spin_lock_irqsave(&cons->rx_lock, flags);
list_add_tail(&rx_msg->link, &cons->rx_msg_list);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cons->rx_msg_lock, flags);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cons->rx_lock, flags);
wake_up(&cons->rx_msg_wq);
}
......@@ -529,9 +528,9 @@ void ivpu_ipc_disable(struct ivpu_device *vdev)
spin_lock_irqsave(&ipc->cons_list_lock, flags);
list_for_each_entry_safe(cons, c, &ipc->cons_list, link) {
spin_lock(&cons->rx_msg_lock);
spin_lock(&cons->rx_lock);
cons->aborted = true;
spin_unlock(&cons->rx_msg_lock);
spin_unlock(&cons->rx_lock);
wake_up(&cons->rx_msg_wq);
}
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ipc->cons_list_lock, flags);
......
......@@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ struct ivpu_ipc_consumer {
u32 request_id;
bool aborted;
spinlock_t rx_msg_lock; /* Protects rx_msg_list and aborted */
spinlock_t rx_lock; /* Protects rx_msg_list and aborted */
struct list_head rx_msg_list;
wait_queue_head_t rx_msg_wq;
};
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment