Commit 0536b852 authored by Björn Töpel's avatar Björn Töpel Committed by Alexei Starovoitov

xdp: Simplify devmap cleanup

After the RCU flavor consolidation [1], call_rcu() and
synchronize_rcu() waits for preempt-disable regions (NAPI) in addition
to the read-side critical sections. As a result of this, the cleanup
code in devmap can be simplified

* There is no longer a need to flush in __dev_map_entry_free, since we
  know that this has been done when the call_rcu() callback is
  triggered.

* When freeing the map, there is no need to explicitly wait for a
  flush. It's guaranteed to be done after the synchronize_rcu() call
  in dev_map_free(). The rcu_barrier() is still needed, so that the
  map is not freed prior the elements.

[1] https://lwn.net/Articles/777036/Signed-off-by: default avatarBjörn Töpel <bjorn.topel@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: default avatarToke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@redhat.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20191219061006.21980-2-bjorn.topel@gmail.com
parent 5bf2fc1f
......@@ -201,7 +201,7 @@ static struct bpf_map *dev_map_alloc(union bpf_attr *attr)
static void dev_map_free(struct bpf_map *map)
{
struct bpf_dtab *dtab = container_of(map, struct bpf_dtab, map);
int i, cpu;
int i;
/* At this point bpf_prog->aux->refcnt == 0 and this map->refcnt == 0,
* so the programs (can be more than one that used this map) were
......@@ -221,18 +221,6 @@ static void dev_map_free(struct bpf_map *map)
/* Make sure prior __dev_map_entry_free() have completed. */
rcu_barrier();
/* To ensure all pending flush operations have completed wait for flush
* list to empty on _all_ cpus.
* Because the above synchronize_rcu() ensures the map is disconnected
* from the program we can assume no new items will be added.
*/
for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
struct list_head *flush_list = per_cpu_ptr(dtab->flush_list, cpu);
while (!list_empty(flush_list))
cond_resched();
}
if (dtab->map.map_type == BPF_MAP_TYPE_DEVMAP_HASH) {
for (i = 0; i < dtab->n_buckets; i++) {
struct bpf_dtab_netdev *dev;
......@@ -345,8 +333,7 @@ static int dev_map_hash_get_next_key(struct bpf_map *map, void *key,
return -ENOENT;
}
static int bq_xmit_all(struct xdp_bulk_queue *bq, u32 flags,
bool in_napi_ctx)
static int bq_xmit_all(struct xdp_bulk_queue *bq, u32 flags)
{
struct bpf_dtab_netdev *obj = bq->obj;
struct net_device *dev = obj->dev;
......@@ -384,11 +371,7 @@ static int bq_xmit_all(struct xdp_bulk_queue *bq, u32 flags,
for (i = 0; i < bq->count; i++) {
struct xdp_frame *xdpf = bq->q[i];
/* RX path under NAPI protection, can return frames faster */
if (likely(in_napi_ctx))
xdp_return_frame_rx_napi(xdpf);
else
xdp_return_frame(xdpf);
xdp_return_frame_rx_napi(xdpf);
drops++;
}
goto out;
......@@ -409,7 +392,7 @@ void __dev_map_flush(struct bpf_map *map)
rcu_read_lock();
list_for_each_entry_safe(bq, tmp, flush_list, flush_node)
bq_xmit_all(bq, XDP_XMIT_FLUSH, true);
bq_xmit_all(bq, XDP_XMIT_FLUSH);
rcu_read_unlock();
}
......@@ -440,7 +423,7 @@ static int bq_enqueue(struct bpf_dtab_netdev *obj, struct xdp_frame *xdpf,
struct xdp_bulk_queue *bq = this_cpu_ptr(obj->bulkq);
if (unlikely(bq->count == DEV_MAP_BULK_SIZE))
bq_xmit_all(bq, 0, true);
bq_xmit_all(bq, 0);
/* Ingress dev_rx will be the same for all xdp_frame's in
* bulk_queue, because bq stored per-CPU and must be flushed
......@@ -509,27 +492,11 @@ static void *dev_map_hash_lookup_elem(struct bpf_map *map, void *key)
return dev ? &dev->ifindex : NULL;
}
static void dev_map_flush_old(struct bpf_dtab_netdev *dev)
{
if (dev->dev->netdev_ops->ndo_xdp_xmit) {
struct xdp_bulk_queue *bq;
int cpu;
rcu_read_lock();
for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
bq = per_cpu_ptr(dev->bulkq, cpu);
bq_xmit_all(bq, XDP_XMIT_FLUSH, false);
}
rcu_read_unlock();
}
}
static void __dev_map_entry_free(struct rcu_head *rcu)
{
struct bpf_dtab_netdev *dev;
dev = container_of(rcu, struct bpf_dtab_netdev, rcu);
dev_map_flush_old(dev);
free_percpu(dev->bulkq);
dev_put(dev->dev);
kfree(dev);
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment