Commit 05cbaf4d authored by Will Deacon's avatar Will Deacon

iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Document ordering guarantees of command insertion

It turns out that we've always relied on some subtle ordering guarantees
when inserting commands into the SMMUv3 command queue. With the recent
changes to elide locking when possible, these guarantees become more
subtle and even more important.

Add a comment documented the barrier semantics of command insertion so
that we don't have to derive the behaviour from scratch each time it
comes up on the list.
Signed-off-by: default avatarWill Deacon <will@kernel.org>
parent 2af2e72b
......@@ -1286,6 +1286,22 @@ static void arm_smmu_cmdq_write_entries(struct arm_smmu_cmdq *cmdq, u64 *cmds,
}
}
/*
* This is the actual insertion function, and provides the following
* ordering guarantees to callers:
*
* - There is a dma_wmb() before publishing any commands to the queue.
* This can be relied upon to order prior writes to data structures
* in memory (such as a CD or an STE) before the command.
*
* - On completion of a CMD_SYNC, there is a control dependency.
* This can be relied upon to order subsequent writes to memory (e.g.
* freeing an IOVA) after completion of the CMD_SYNC.
*
* - Command insertion is totally ordered, so if two CPUs each race to
* insert their own list of commands then all of the commands from one
* CPU will appear before any of the commands from the other CPU.
*/
static int arm_smmu_cmdq_issue_cmdlist(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu,
u64 *cmds, int n, bool sync)
{
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment