Commit 09f2ba0b authored by Jisheng Zhang's avatar Jisheng Zhang Committed by Mark Brown

regulator: gpio: properly check return value of of_get_named_gpio

The function of_get_named_gpio() could return -ENOENT, -EPROBE_DEFER
-EINVAL and so on. Currently, for the optional property "enable-gpio",
we only check -EPROBE_DEFER, this is not enough since there may be
misconfigured "enable-gpio" in the DTB, of_get_named_gpio() will return
-EINVAL in this case, we should return immediately here. And for the
optional property "gpios", we didn't check the return value, the driver
will continue to the point where gpio_request_array() is called, it
doesn't make sense to continue if we got -EPROBE_DEFER or -EINVAL here.

This patch tries to address these two issues by properly checking the
return value of of_get_named_gpio.
Signed-off-by: default avatarJisheng Zhang <jszhang@marvell.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarMark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
parent 1001354c
......@@ -162,8 +162,8 @@ of_get_gpio_regulator_config(struct device *dev, struct device_node *np,
of_property_read_u32(np, "startup-delay-us", &config->startup_delay);
config->enable_gpio = of_get_named_gpio(np, "enable-gpio", 0);
if (config->enable_gpio == -EPROBE_DEFER)
return ERR_PTR(-EPROBE_DEFER);
if (config->enable_gpio < 0 && config->enable_gpio != -ENOENT)
return ERR_PTR(config->enable_gpio);
/* Fetch GPIOs. - optional property*/
ret = of_gpio_count(np);
......@@ -190,8 +190,11 @@ of_get_gpio_regulator_config(struct device *dev, struct device_node *np,
for (i = 0; i < config->nr_gpios; i++) {
gpio = of_get_named_gpio(np, "gpios", i);
if (gpio < 0)
if (gpio < 0) {
if (gpio != -ENOENT)
return ERR_PTR(gpio);
break;
}
config->gpios[i].gpio = gpio;
if (proplen > 0) {
of_property_read_u32_index(np, "gpios-states",
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment