Commit 0ac6e06b authored by David Sterba's avatar David Sterba

btrfs: tree-checker: use table values for stripe checks

There are hardcoded values in several checks regarding chunks and stripe
constraints. We have that defined in the raid table and ought to use it.
Reviewed-by: default avatarQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
parent 809d6902
...@@ -873,13 +873,18 @@ int btrfs_check_chunk_valid(struct extent_buffer *leaf, ...@@ -873,13 +873,18 @@ int btrfs_check_chunk_valid(struct extent_buffer *leaf,
} }
} }
if (unlikely((type & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID10 && sub_stripes != 2) || if (unlikely((type & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID10 &&
(type & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID1 && num_stripes != 2) || sub_stripes != btrfs_raid_array[BTRFS_RAID_RAID10].sub_stripes) ||
(type & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID5 && num_stripes < 2) || (type & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID1 &&
(type & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID6 && num_stripes < 3) || num_stripes != btrfs_raid_array[BTRFS_RAID_RAID1].devs_min) ||
(type & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DUP && num_stripes != 2) || (type & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID5 &&
num_stripes < btrfs_raid_array[BTRFS_RAID_RAID5].devs_min) ||
(type & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID6 &&
num_stripes < btrfs_raid_array[BTRFS_RAID_RAID6].devs_min) ||
(type & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DUP &&
num_stripes != btrfs_raid_array[BTRFS_RAID_DUP].dev_stripes) ||
((type & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_PROFILE_MASK) == 0 && ((type & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_PROFILE_MASK) == 0 &&
num_stripes != 1))) { num_stripes != btrfs_raid_array[BTRFS_RAID_SINGLE].dev_stripes))) {
chunk_err(leaf, chunk, logical, chunk_err(leaf, chunk, logical,
"invalid num_stripes:sub_stripes %u:%u for profile %llu", "invalid num_stripes:sub_stripes %u:%u for profile %llu",
num_stripes, sub_stripes, num_stripes, sub_stripes,
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment