signals/sigaltstack, x86/signals: Unify the x86 sigaltstack check with other architectures
Currently x86's get_sigframe() checks for "current->sas_ss_size" to determine whether there is a need to switch to sigaltstack. The common practice used by all other arches is to check for sas_ss_flags(sp) == 0 This patch makes the code consistent with other architectures. The slight complexity of the patch is added by the optimization on !sigstack check that was requested by Andy Lutomirski: sas_ss_flags(sp)==0 already implies that we are not on a sigstack, so the code is shuffled to avoid the duplicate checking. This patch should have no user-visible impact. Signed-off-by: Stas Sergeev <stsp@list.ru> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com> Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Cc: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@parallels.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuahkh@osg.samsung.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: linux-api@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1460665206-13646-2-git-send-email-stsp@list.ruSigned-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Showing
Please register or sign in to comment