Commit 1162563f authored by Jiri Pirko's avatar Jiri Pirko Committed by David S. Miller

af_packet: move strict addr_len check right before dev_[mc/unicast]_[add/del]

My previous patch 914c8ad2 incorrectly changed
the length check in packet_mc_add to be more strict. The problem is that
userspace is not filling this field (and it stays zeroed) in case of setting
PACKET_MR_PROMISC or PACKET_MR_ALLMULTI. So move the strict check to the point
in path where the addr_len must be set correctly.
Signed-off-by: default avatarJiri Pirko <jpirko@redhat.com>
Reported-by: default avatarPavel Roskin <proski@gnu.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
parent 9fe96934
...@@ -1688,6 +1688,8 @@ static int packet_dev_mc(struct net_device *dev, struct packet_mclist *i, ...@@ -1688,6 +1688,8 @@ static int packet_dev_mc(struct net_device *dev, struct packet_mclist *i,
{ {
switch (i->type) { switch (i->type) {
case PACKET_MR_MULTICAST: case PACKET_MR_MULTICAST:
if (i->alen != dev->addr_len)
return -EINVAL;
if (what > 0) if (what > 0)
return dev_mc_add(dev, i->addr, i->alen, 0); return dev_mc_add(dev, i->addr, i->alen, 0);
else else
...@@ -1700,6 +1702,8 @@ static int packet_dev_mc(struct net_device *dev, struct packet_mclist *i, ...@@ -1700,6 +1702,8 @@ static int packet_dev_mc(struct net_device *dev, struct packet_mclist *i,
return dev_set_allmulti(dev, what); return dev_set_allmulti(dev, what);
break; break;
case PACKET_MR_UNICAST: case PACKET_MR_UNICAST:
if (i->alen != dev->addr_len)
return -EINVAL;
if (what > 0) if (what > 0)
return dev_unicast_add(dev, i->addr); return dev_unicast_add(dev, i->addr);
else else
...@@ -1734,7 +1738,7 @@ static int packet_mc_add(struct sock *sk, struct packet_mreq_max *mreq) ...@@ -1734,7 +1738,7 @@ static int packet_mc_add(struct sock *sk, struct packet_mreq_max *mreq)
goto done; goto done;
err = -EINVAL; err = -EINVAL;
if (mreq->mr_alen != dev->addr_len) if (mreq->mr_alen > dev->addr_len)
goto done; goto done;
err = -ENOBUFS; err = -ENOBUFS;
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment