Commit 126e4bc3 authored by Chuck Lever's avatar Chuck Lever Committed by Trond Myklebust

SUNRPC: rpcbind actually interprets r_owner string

RFC 1833 has little to say about the contents of r_owner; it only
specifies that it is a string, and states that it is used to control
who can UNSET an entry.

Our port of rpcbind (from Sun) assumes this string contains a numeric
UID value, not alphabetical or symbolic characters, but checks this
value only for AF_LOCAL RPCB_SET or RPCB_UNSET requests.  In all other
cases, rpcbind ignores the contents of the r_owner string.

The reference user space implementation of rpcb_set(3) uses a numeric
UID for all SET/UNSET requests (even via the network) and an empty
string for all other requests.  We emulate that behavior here to
maintain bug-for-bug compatibility.
Signed-off-by: default avatarChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
parent 3aba4553
......@@ -63,9 +63,16 @@ enum {
* r_owner
*
* The "owner" is allowed to unset a service in the rpcbind database.
* We always use the following (arbitrary) fixed string.
*
* For AF_LOCAL SET/UNSET requests, rpcbind treats this string as a
* UID which it maps to a local user name via a password lookup.
* In all other cases it is ignored.
*
* For SET/UNSET requests, user space provides a value, even for
* network requests, and GETADDR uses an empty string. We follow
* those precedents here.
*/
#define RPCB_OWNER_STRING "rpcb"
#define RPCB_OWNER_STRING "0"
#define RPCB_MAXOWNERLEN sizeof(RPCB_OWNER_STRING)
static void rpcb_getport_done(struct rpc_task *, void *);
......@@ -566,7 +573,7 @@ void rpcb_getport_async(struct rpc_task *task)
map->r_xprt = xprt_get(xprt);
map->r_netid = rpc_peeraddr2str(clnt, RPC_DISPLAY_NETID);
map->r_addr = rpc_peeraddr2str(rpcb_clnt, RPC_DISPLAY_UNIVERSAL_ADDR);
map->r_owner = RPCB_OWNER_STRING; /* ignored for GETADDR */
map->r_owner = "";
map->r_status = -EIO;
child = rpcb_call_async(rpcb_clnt, map, proc);
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment