Commit 16b0a7a1 authored by Vincent Guittot's avatar Vincent Guittot Committed by Peter Zijlstra

sched/fair: Ensure tasks spreading in LLC during LB

schbench shows latency increase for 95 percentile above since:
  commit 0b0695f2 ("sched/fair: Rework load_balance()")

Align the behavior of the load balancer with the wake up path, which tries
to select an idle CPU which belongs to the LLC for a waking task.

calculate_imbalance() will use nr_running instead of the spare
capacity when CPUs share resources (ie cache) at the domain level. This
will ensure a better spread of tasks on idle CPUs.

Running schbench on a hikey (8cores arm64) shows the problem:

tip/sched/core :
schbench -m 2 -t 4 -s 10000 -c 1000000 -r 10
Latency percentiles (usec)
	50.0th: 33
	75.0th: 45
	90.0th: 51
	95.0th: 4152
	*99.0th: 14288
	99.5th: 14288
	99.9th: 14288
	min=0, max=14276

tip/sched/core + patch :
schbench -m 2 -t 4 -s 10000 -c 1000000 -r 10
Latency percentiles (usec)
	50.0th: 34
	75.0th: 47
	90.0th: 52
	95.0th: 78
	*99.0th: 94
	99.5th: 94
	99.9th: 94
	min=0, max=94

Fixes: 0b0695f2 ("sched/fair: Rework load_balance()")
Reported-by: default avatarChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
Suggested-by: default avatarRik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarVincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: default avatarRik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
Tested-by: default avatarRik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201102102457.28808-1-vincent.guittot@linaro.org
parent a73f863a
......@@ -9031,7 +9031,8 @@ static inline void calculate_imbalance(struct lb_env *env, struct sd_lb_stats *s
* emptying busiest.
*/
if (local->group_type == group_has_spare) {
if (busiest->group_type > group_fully_busy) {
if ((busiest->group_type > group_fully_busy) &&
!(env->sd->flags & SD_SHARE_PKG_RESOURCES)) {
/*
* If busiest is overloaded, try to fill spare
* capacity. This might end up creating spare capacity
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment