Commit 17fcbd59 authored by Niklas Cassel's avatar Niklas Cassel Committed by Ingo Molnar

locking/rwsem: Fix down_write_killable() for CONFIG_RWSEM_GENERIC_SPINLOCK=y

We hang if SIGKILL has been sent, but the task is stuck in down_read()
(after do_exit()), even though no task is doing down_write() on the
rwsem in question:

  INFO: task libupnp:21868 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
  libupnp         D    0 21868      1 0x08100008
  ...
  Call Trace:
  __schedule()
  schedule()
  __down_read()
  do_exit()
  do_group_exit()
  __wake_up_parent()

This bug has already been fixed for CONFIG_RWSEM_XCHGADD_ALGORITHM=y in
the following commit:

 04cafed7 ("locking/rwsem: Fix down_write_killable()")

... however, this bug also exists for CONFIG_RWSEM_GENERIC_SPINLOCK=y.
Signed-off-by: default avatarNiklas Cassel <niklas.cassel@axis.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Niklas Cassel <niklass@axis.com>
Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Fixes: d4799608 ("locking/rwsem: Introduce basis for down_write_killable()")
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1487981873-12649-1-git-send-email-niklass@axis.comSigned-off-by: default avatarIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
parent 9bbb25af
...@@ -213,10 +213,9 @@ int __sched __down_write_common(struct rw_semaphore *sem, int state) ...@@ -213,10 +213,9 @@ int __sched __down_write_common(struct rw_semaphore *sem, int state)
*/ */
if (sem->count == 0) if (sem->count == 0)
break; break;
if (signal_pending_state(state, current)) { if (signal_pending_state(state, current))
ret = -EINTR; goto out_nolock;
goto out;
}
set_current_state(state); set_current_state(state);
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sem->wait_lock, flags); raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sem->wait_lock, flags);
schedule(); schedule();
...@@ -224,12 +223,19 @@ int __sched __down_write_common(struct rw_semaphore *sem, int state) ...@@ -224,12 +223,19 @@ int __sched __down_write_common(struct rw_semaphore *sem, int state)
} }
/* got the lock */ /* got the lock */
sem->count = -1; sem->count = -1;
out:
list_del(&waiter.list); list_del(&waiter.list);
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sem->wait_lock, flags); raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sem->wait_lock, flags);
return ret; return ret;
out_nolock:
list_del(&waiter.list);
if (!list_empty(&sem->wait_list))
__rwsem_do_wake(sem, 1);
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sem->wait_lock, flags);
return -EINTR;
} }
void __sched __down_write(struct rw_semaphore *sem) void __sched __down_write(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment