Commit 1aa65f4d authored by Manuel Schölling's avatar Manuel Schölling Committed by Jeff Kirsher

e1000: Use time_after() for time comparison

To be future-proof and for better readability the time comparisons are modified
to use time_after() instead of plain, error-prone math.
Signed-off-by: default avatarManuel Schölling <manuel.schoelling@gmx.de>
Tested-by: default avatarAaron Brown <aaron.f.brown@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarJeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>
parent c46d1504
......@@ -1460,7 +1460,8 @@ static int e1000_run_loopback_test(struct e1000_adapter *adapter)
* enough time to complete the receives, if it's
* exceeded, break and error off
*/
} while (good_cnt < 64 && jiffies < (time + 20));
} while (good_cnt < 64 && time_after(time + 20, jiffies));
if (good_cnt != 64) {
ret_val = 13; /* ret_val is the same as mis-compare */
break;
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment