Commit 1aba06e7 authored by Mark Rutland's avatar Mark Rutland Committed by Will Deacon

arm64: stacktrace: factor out kunwind_stack_walk()

Currently arm64 uses the generic arch_stack_walk() interface for all
stack walking code. This only passes a PC value and cookie to the unwind
callback, whereas we'd like to pass some additional information in some
cases. For example, the BPF exception unwinder wants the FP, for
reliable stacktrace we'll want to perform additional checks on other
portions of unwind state, and we'd like to expand the information
printed by dump_backtrace() to include provenance and reliability
information.

As preparation for all of the above, this patch factors the core unwind
logic out of arch_stack_walk() and into a new kunwind_stack_walk()
function which provides all of the unwind state to a callback function.
The existing arch_stack_walk() interface is implemented atop this.

The kunwind_stack_walk() function is intended to be a private
implementation detail of unwinders in stacktrace.c, and not something to
be exported generally to kernel code. It is __always_inline'd into its
caller so that neither it or its caller appear in stactraces (which is
the existing/required behavior for arch_stack_walk() and friends) and so
that the compiler can optimize away some of the indirection.

There should be no functional change as a result of this patch.
Signed-off-by: default avatarMark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@google.com>
Cc: Madhavan T. Venkataraman <madvenka@linux.microsoft.com>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay12@gmail.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: default avatarKalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@google.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarPuranjay Mohan <puranjay12@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarMadhavan T. Venkataraman <madvenka@linux.microsoft.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarMark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231124110511.2795958-3-mark.rutland@arm.comSigned-off-by: default avatarWill Deacon <will@kernel.org>
parent 1beef60e
...@@ -154,8 +154,10 @@ kunwind_next(struct kunwind_state *state) ...@@ -154,8 +154,10 @@ kunwind_next(struct kunwind_state *state)
return kunwind_recover_return_address(state); return kunwind_recover_return_address(state);
} }
typedef bool (*kunwind_consume_fn)(const struct kunwind_state *state, void *cookie);
static __always_inline void static __always_inline void
do_kunwind(struct kunwind_state *state, stack_trace_consume_fn consume_entry, do_kunwind(struct kunwind_state *state, kunwind_consume_fn consume_state,
void *cookie) void *cookie)
{ {
if (kunwind_recover_return_address(state)) if (kunwind_recover_return_address(state))
...@@ -164,7 +166,7 @@ do_kunwind(struct kunwind_state *state, stack_trace_consume_fn consume_entry, ...@@ -164,7 +166,7 @@ do_kunwind(struct kunwind_state *state, stack_trace_consume_fn consume_entry,
while (1) { while (1) {
int ret; int ret;
if (!consume_entry(cookie, state->common.pc)) if (!consume_state(state, cookie))
break; break;
ret = kunwind_next(state); ret = kunwind_next(state);
if (ret < 0) if (ret < 0)
...@@ -201,9 +203,10 @@ do_kunwind(struct kunwind_state *state, stack_trace_consume_fn consume_entry, ...@@ -201,9 +203,10 @@ do_kunwind(struct kunwind_state *state, stack_trace_consume_fn consume_entry,
: stackinfo_get_unknown(); \ : stackinfo_get_unknown(); \
}) })
noinline noinstr void arch_stack_walk(stack_trace_consume_fn consume_entry, static __always_inline void
void *cookie, struct task_struct *task, kunwind_stack_walk(kunwind_consume_fn consume_state,
struct pt_regs *regs) void *cookie, struct task_struct *task,
struct pt_regs *regs)
{ {
struct stack_info stacks[] = { struct stack_info stacks[] = {
stackinfo_get_task(task), stackinfo_get_task(task),
...@@ -236,7 +239,31 @@ noinline noinstr void arch_stack_walk(stack_trace_consume_fn consume_entry, ...@@ -236,7 +239,31 @@ noinline noinstr void arch_stack_walk(stack_trace_consume_fn consume_entry,
kunwind_init_from_task(&state, task); kunwind_init_from_task(&state, task);
} }
do_kunwind(&state, consume_entry, cookie); do_kunwind(&state, consume_state, cookie);
}
struct kunwind_consume_entry_data {
stack_trace_consume_fn consume_entry;
void *cookie;
};
static bool
arch_kunwind_consume_entry(const struct kunwind_state *state, void *cookie)
{
struct kunwind_consume_entry_data *data = cookie;
return data->consume_entry(data->cookie, state->common.pc);
}
noinline noinstr void arch_stack_walk(stack_trace_consume_fn consume_entry,
void *cookie, struct task_struct *task,
struct pt_regs *regs)
{
struct kunwind_consume_entry_data data = {
.consume_entry = consume_entry,
.cookie = cookie,
};
kunwind_stack_walk(arch_kunwind_consume_entry, &data, task, regs);
} }
static bool dump_backtrace_entry(void *arg, unsigned long where) static bool dump_backtrace_entry(void *arg, unsigned long where)
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment