block, bfq: reduce idling only in symmetric scenarios

A seeky queue (i..e, a queue containing random requests) is assigned a
very small device-idling slice, for throughput issues. Unfortunately,
given the process associated with a seeky queue, this behavior causes
the following problem: if the process, say P, performs sync I/O and
has a higher weight than some other processes doing I/O and associated
with non-seeky queues, then BFQ may fail to guarantee to P its
reserved share of the throughput. The reason is that idling is key
for providing service guarantees to processes doing sync I/O [1].

This commit addresses this issue by allowing the device-idling slice
to be reduced for a seeky queue only if the scenario happens to be
symmetric, i.e., if all the queues are to receive the same share of
the throughput.

[1] P. Valente, A. Avanzini, "Evolution of the BFQ Storage I/O
    Scheduler", Proceedings of the First Workshop on Mobile System
    Technologies (MST-2015), May 2015.
    http://algogroup.unimore.it/people/paolo/disk_sched/mst-2015.pdfSigned-off-by: Arianna Avanzini <avanzini.arianna@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Riccardo Pizzetti <riccardo.pizzetti@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Samuele Zecchini <samuele.zecchini92@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>

block/bfq-iosched.c

@@ -182,6 +182,20 @@ struct bfq_sched_data {
 
 };
 
+/**
+ * struct bfq_weight_counter - counter of the number of all active entities
+ *                             with a given weight.
+ */
+struct bfq_weight_counter {
+	unsigned int weight; /* weight of the entities this counter refers to */
+	unsigned int num_active; /* nr of active entities with this weight */
+	/*
+	 * Weights tree member (see bfq_data's @queue_weights_tree and
+	 * @group_weights_tree)
+	 */
+	struct rb_node weights_node;
+};
+
 /**
  * struct bfq_entity - schedulable entity.
  *
@@ -212,6 +226,8 @@ struct bfq_sched_data {
 struct bfq_entity {
 	/* service_tree member */
 	struct rb_node rb_node;
+	/* pointer to the weight counter associated with this entity */
+	struct bfq_weight_counter *weight_counter;
 
 	/*
 	 * Flag, true if the entity is on a tree (either the active or
@@ -455,6 +471,25 @@ struct bfq_data {
 	/* root bfq_group for the device */
 	struct bfq_group *root_group;
 
+	/*
+	 * rbtree of weight counters of @bfq_queues, sorted by
+	 * weight. Used to keep track of whether all @bfq_queues have
+	 * the same weight. The tree contains one counter for each
+	 * distinct weight associated to some active and not
+	 * weight-raised @bfq_queue (see the comments to the functions
+	 * bfq_weights_tree_[add|remove] for further details).
+	 */
+	struct rb_root queue_weights_tree;
+	/*
+	 * rbtree of non-queue @bfq_entity weight counters, sorted by
+	 * weight. Used to keep track of whether all @bfq_groups have
+	 * the same weight. The tree contains one counter for each
+	 * distinct weight associated to some active @bfq_group (see
+	 * the comments to the functions bfq_weights_tree_[add|remove]
+	 * for further details).
+	 */
+	struct rb_root group_weights_tree;
+
 	/*
 	 * Number of bfq_queues containing requests (including the
 	 * queue in service, even if it is idling).
@@ -791,6 +826,11 @@ struct bfq_group_data {
  *             to avoid too many special cases during group creation/
  *             migration.
  * @stats: stats for this bfqg.
+ * @active_entities: number of active entities belonging to the group;
+ *                   unused for the root group. Used to know whether there
+ *                   are groups with more than one active @bfq_entity
+ *                   (see the comments to the function
+ *                   bfq_bfqq_may_idle()).
  * @rq_pos_tree: rbtree sorted by next_request position, used when
  *               determining if two or more queues have interleaving
  *               requests (see bfq_find_close_cooperator()).
@@ -818,6 +858,8 @@ struct bfq_group {
 
 	struct bfq_entity *my_entity;
 
+	int active_entities;
+
 	struct rb_root rq_pos_tree;
 
 	struct bfqg_stats stats;
@@ -1254,12 +1296,27 @@ static bool bfq_update_parent_budget(struct bfq_entity *next_in_service)
  * a candidate for next service (i.e, a candidate entity to serve
  * after the in-service entity is expired). The function then returns
  * true.
+ *
+ * In contrast, the entity could stil be a candidate for next service
+ * if it is not a queue, and has more than one child. In fact, even if
+ * one of its children is about to be set in service, other children
+ * may still be the next to serve. As a consequence, a non-queue
+ * entity is not a candidate for next-service only if it has only one
+ * child. And only if this condition holds, then the function returns
+ * true for a non-queue entity.
  */
 static bool bfq_no_longer_next_in_service(struct bfq_entity *entity)
 {
+	struct bfq_group *bfqg;
+
 	if (bfq_entity_to_bfqq(entity))
 		return true;
 
+	bfqg = container_of(entity, struct bfq_group, entity);
+
+	if (bfqg->active_entities == 1)
+		return true;
+
 	return false;
 }
 
@@ -1498,6 +1555,15 @@ static void bfq_update_active_tree(struct rb_node *node)
 	goto up;
 }
 
+static void bfq_weights_tree_add(struct bfq_data *bfqd,
+				 struct bfq_entity *entity,
+				 struct rb_root *root);
+
+static void bfq_weights_tree_remove(struct bfq_data *bfqd,
+				    struct bfq_entity *entity,
+				    struct rb_root *root);
+
+
 /**
  * bfq_active_insert - insert an entity in the active tree of its
  *                     group/device.
@@ -1536,6 +1602,13 @@ static void bfq_active_insert(struct bfq_service_tree *st,
 #endif
 	if (bfqq)
 		list_add(&bfqq->bfqq_list, &bfqq->bfqd->active_list);
+#ifdef CONFIG_BFQ_GROUP_IOSCHED
+	else /* bfq_group */
+		bfq_weights_tree_add(bfqd, entity, &bfqd->group_weights_tree);
+
+	if (bfqg != bfqd->root_group)
+		bfqg->active_entities++;
+#endif
 }
 
 /**
@@ -1631,6 +1704,14 @@ static void bfq_active_extract(struct bfq_service_tree *st,
 #endif
 	if (bfqq)
 		list_del(&bfqq->bfqq_list);
+#ifdef CONFIG_BFQ_GROUP_IOSCHED
+	else /* bfq_group */
+		bfq_weights_tree_remove(bfqd, entity,
+					&bfqd->group_weights_tree);
+
+	if (bfqg != bfqd->root_group)
+		bfqg->active_entities--;
+#endif
 }
 
 /**
@@ -1731,6 +1812,7 @@ __bfq_entity_update_weight_prio(struct bfq_service_tree *old_st,
 		struct bfq_queue *bfqq = bfq_entity_to_bfqq(entity);
 		unsigned int prev_weight, new_weight;
 		struct bfq_data *bfqd = NULL;
+		struct rb_root *root;
 #ifdef CONFIG_BFQ_GROUP_IOSCHED
 		struct bfq_sched_data *sd;
 		struct bfq_group *bfqg;
@@ -1780,7 +1862,26 @@ __bfq_entity_update_weight_prio(struct bfq_service_tree *old_st,
 		prev_weight = entity->weight;
 		new_weight = entity->orig_weight *
 			     (bfqq ? bfqq->wr_coeff : 1);
+		/*
+		 * If the weight of the entity changes, remove the entity
+		 * from its old weight counter (if there is a counter
+		 * associated with the entity), and add it to the counter
+		 * associated with its new weight.
+		 */
+		if (prev_weight != new_weight) {
+			root = bfqq ? &bfqd->queue_weights_tree :
+				      &bfqd->group_weights_tree;
+			bfq_weights_tree_remove(bfqd, entity, root);
+		}
 		entity->weight = new_weight;
+		/*
+		 * Add the entity to its weights tree only if it is
+		 * not associated with a weight-raised queue.
+		 */
+		if (prev_weight != new_weight &&
+		    (bfqq ? bfqq->wr_coeff == 1 : 1))
+			/* If we get here, root has been initialized. */
+			bfq_weights_tree_add(bfqd, entity, root);
 
 		new_st->wsum += entity->weight;
 
@@ -2606,6 +2707,10 @@ static void bfq_del_bfqq_busy(struct bfq_data *bfqd, struct bfq_queue *bfqq,
 
 	bfqd->busy_queues--;
 
+	if (!bfqq->dispatched)
+		bfq_weights_tree_remove(bfqd, &bfqq->entity,
+					&bfqd->queue_weights_tree);
+
 	if (bfqq->wr_coeff > 1)
 		bfqd->wr_busy_queues--;
 
@@ -2626,6 +2731,11 @@ static void bfq_add_bfqq_busy(struct bfq_data *bfqd, struct bfq_queue *bfqq)
 	bfq_mark_bfqq_busy(bfqq);
 	bfqd->busy_queues++;
 
+	if (!bfqq->dispatched)
+		if (bfqq->wr_coeff == 1)
+			bfq_weights_tree_add(bfqd, &bfqq->entity,
+					     &bfqd->queue_weights_tree);
+
 	if (bfqq->wr_coeff > 1)
 		bfqd->wr_busy_queues++;
 }
@@ -3028,6 +3138,7 @@ static void bfq_pd_init(struct blkg_policy_data *pd)
 				   * in bfq_init_queue()
 				   */
 	bfqg->bfqd = bfqd;
+	bfqg->active_entities = 0;
 	bfqg->rq_pos_tree = RB_ROOT;
 }
 
@@ -3915,6 +4026,158 @@ static void bfq_pos_tree_add_move(struct bfq_data *bfqd, struct bfq_queue *bfqq)
 		bfqq->pos_root = NULL;
 }
 
+/*
+ * Tell whether there are active queues or groups with differentiated weights.
+ */
+static bool bfq_differentiated_weights(struct bfq_data *bfqd)
+{
+	/*
+	 * For weights to differ, at least one of the trees must contain
+	 * at least two nodes.
+	 */
+	return (!RB_EMPTY_ROOT(&bfqd->queue_weights_tree) &&
+		(bfqd->queue_weights_tree.rb_node->rb_left ||
+		 bfqd->queue_weights_tree.rb_node->rb_right)
+#ifdef CONFIG_BFQ_GROUP_IOSCHED
+	       ) ||
+	       (!RB_EMPTY_ROOT(&bfqd->group_weights_tree) &&
+		(bfqd->group_weights_tree.rb_node->rb_left ||
+		 bfqd->group_weights_tree.rb_node->rb_right)
+#endif
+	       );
+}
+
+/*
+ * The following function returns true if every queue must receive the
+ * same share of the throughput (this condition is used when deciding
+ * whether idling may be disabled, see the comments in the function
+ * bfq_bfqq_may_idle()).
+ *
+ * Such a scenario occurs when:
+ * 1) all active queues have the same weight,
+ * 2) all active groups at the same level in the groups tree have the same
+ *    weight,
+ * 3) all active groups at the same level in the groups tree have the same
+ *    number of children.
+ *
+ * Unfortunately, keeping the necessary state for evaluating exactly the
+ * above symmetry conditions would be quite complex and time-consuming.
+ * Therefore this function evaluates, instead, the following stronger
+ * sub-conditions, for which it is much easier to maintain the needed
+ * state:
+ * 1) all active queues have the same weight,
+ * 2) all active groups have the same weight,
+ * 3) all active groups have at most one active child each.
+ * In particular, the last two conditions are always true if hierarchical
+ * support and the cgroups interface are not enabled, thus no state needs
+ * to be maintained in this case.
+ */
+static bool bfq_symmetric_scenario(struct bfq_data *bfqd)
+{
+	return !bfq_differentiated_weights(bfqd);
+}
+
+/*
+ * If the weight-counter tree passed as input contains no counter for
+ * the weight of the input entity, then add that counter; otherwise just
+ * increment the existing counter.
+ *
+ * Note that weight-counter trees contain few nodes in mostly symmetric
+ * scenarios. For example, if all queues have the same weight, then the
+ * weight-counter tree for the queues may contain at most one node.
+ * This holds even if low_latency is on, because weight-raised queues
+ * are not inserted in the tree.
+ * In most scenarios, the rate at which nodes are created/destroyed
+ * should be low too.
+ */
+static void bfq_weights_tree_add(struct bfq_data *bfqd,
+				 struct bfq_entity *entity,
+				 struct rb_root *root)
+{
+	struct rb_node **new = &(root->rb_node), *parent = NULL;
+
+	/*
+	 * Do not insert if the entity is already associated with a
+	 * counter, which happens if:
+	 *   1) the entity is associated with a queue,
+	 *   2) a request arrival has caused the queue to become both
+	 *      non-weight-raised, and hence change its weight, and
+	 *      backlogged; in this respect, each of the two events
+	 *      causes an invocation of this function,
+	 *   3) this is the invocation of this function caused by the
+	 *      second event. This second invocation is actually useless,
+	 *      and we handle this fact by exiting immediately. More
+	 *      efficient or clearer solutions might possibly be adopted.
+	 */
+	if (entity->weight_counter)
+		return;
+
+	while (*new) {
+		struct bfq_weight_counter *__counter = container_of(*new,
+						struct bfq_weight_counter,
+						weights_node);
+		parent = *new;
+
+		if (entity->weight == __counter->weight) {
+			entity->weight_counter = __counter;
+			goto inc_counter;
+		}
+		if (entity->weight < __counter->weight)
+			new = &((*new)->rb_left);
+		else
+			new = &((*new)->rb_right);
+	}
+
+	entity->weight_counter = kzalloc(sizeof(struct bfq_weight_counter),
+					 GFP_ATOMIC);
+
+	/*
+	 * In the unlucky event of an allocation failure, we just
+	 * exit. This will cause the weight of entity to not be
+	 * considered in bfq_differentiated_weights, which, in its
+	 * turn, causes the scenario to be deemed wrongly symmetric in
+	 * case entity's weight would have been the only weight making
+	 * the scenario asymmetric. On the bright side, no unbalance
+	 * will however occur when entity becomes inactive again (the
+	 * invocation of this function is triggered by an activation
+	 * of entity). In fact, bfq_weights_tree_remove does nothing
+	 * if !entity->weight_counter.
+	 */
+	if (unlikely(!entity->weight_counter))
+		return;
+
+	entity->weight_counter->weight = entity->weight;
+	rb_link_node(&entity->weight_counter->weights_node, parent, new);
+	rb_insert_color(&entity->weight_counter->weights_node, root);
+
+inc_counter:
+	entity->weight_counter->num_active++;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Decrement the weight counter associated with the entity, and, if the
+ * counter reaches 0, remove the counter from the tree.
+ * See the comments to the function bfq_weights_tree_add() for considerations
+ * about overhead.
+ */
+static void bfq_weights_tree_remove(struct bfq_data *bfqd,
+				    struct bfq_entity *entity,
+				    struct rb_root *root)
+{
+	if (!entity->weight_counter)
+		return;
+
+	entity->weight_counter->num_active--;
+	if (entity->weight_counter->num_active > 0)
+		goto reset_entity_pointer;
+
+	rb_erase(&entity->weight_counter->weights_node, root);
+	kfree(entity->weight_counter);
+
+reset_entity_pointer:
+	entity->weight_counter = NULL;
+}
+
 /*
  * Return expired entry, or NULL to just start from scratch in rbtree.
  */
@@ -5293,13 +5556,17 @@ static void bfq_arm_slice_timer(struct bfq_data *bfqd)
 	 */
 	sl = bfqd->bfq_slice_idle;
 	/*
-	 * Unless the queue is being weight-raised, grant only minimum
-	 * idle time if the queue is seeky. A long idling is preserved
-	 * for a weight-raised queue, because it is needed for
-	 * guaranteeing to the queue its reserved share of the
-	 * throughput.
-	 */
-	if (BFQQ_SEEKY(bfqq) && bfqq->wr_coeff == 1)
+	 * Unless the queue is being weight-raised or the scenario is
+	 * asymmetric, grant only minimum idle time if the queue
+	 * is seeky. A long idling is preserved for a weight-raised
+	 * queue, or, more in general, in an asymmetric scenario,
+	 * because a long idling is needed for guaranteeing to a queue
+	 * its reserved share of the throughput (in particular, it is
+	 * needed if the queue has a higher weight than some other
+	 * queue).
+	 */
+	if (BFQQ_SEEKY(bfqq) && bfqq->wr_coeff == 1 &&
+	    bfq_symmetric_scenario(bfqd))
 		sl = min_t(u64, sl, BFQ_MIN_TT);
 
 	bfqd->last_idling_start = ktime_get();
@@ -7197,6 +7464,9 @@ static void bfq_completed_request(struct bfq_queue *bfqq, struct bfq_data *bfqd)
 		 * mechanism).
 		 */
 		bfqq->budget_timeout = jiffies;
+
+		bfq_weights_tree_remove(bfqd, &bfqq->entity,
+					&bfqd->queue_weights_tree);
 	}
 
 	now_ns = ktime_get_ns();
@@ -7627,6 +7897,9 @@ static int bfq_init_queue(struct request_queue *q, struct elevator_type *e)
 		     HRTIMER_MODE_REL);
 	bfqd->idle_slice_timer.function = bfq_idle_slice_timer;
 
+	bfqd->queue_weights_tree = RB_ROOT;
+	bfqd->group_weights_tree = RB_ROOT;
+
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&bfqd->active_list);
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&bfqd->idle_list);