Commit 1e5c5946 authored by surinder's avatar surinder Committed by Russell King

[ARM] 5067/1: _raw_write_can_lock macro bugfix

The current __raw_write_can_lock macro tests whether the lock can be
locked by checking if it is equal to 0x80000000, whereas the lock
should be lockable if its value is 0 i.e. unlocked state is
represented by 0. Hence the macro should test the value of lock
against 0 and not 0x80000000.
Signed-off-by: default avatarSurinder Pal Singh <srplsnh@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
parent ea6a7404
...@@ -142,7 +142,7 @@ static inline void __raw_write_unlock(raw_rwlock_t *rw) ...@@ -142,7 +142,7 @@ static inline void __raw_write_unlock(raw_rwlock_t *rw)
} }
/* write_can_lock - would write_trylock() succeed? */ /* write_can_lock - would write_trylock() succeed? */
#define __raw_write_can_lock(x) ((x)->lock == 0x80000000) #define __raw_write_can_lock(x) ((x)->lock == 0)
/* /*
* Read locks are a bit more hairy: * Read locks are a bit more hairy:
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment