Commit 20bb97fe authored by Rodrigo Vivi's avatar Rodrigo Vivi Committed by Daniel Vetter

drm/i915: Reduce PSR re-activation time for VLV/CHV.

With 'commit 30886c5a ("drm/i915: VLV/CHV PSR: Increase wait delay
 time before active PSR.")' we fixed a blank screen when first
activation was happening immediately after PSR being enabled.
There we gave more time for idleness by increasing the delay
between re-activating sequences.

However, commit "drm/i915: Delay first PSR activation."
delay the first activation in a better way keeping a good PSR
residency. So, we can now reduce the delay on re-enable.
Signed-off-by: default avatarRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarDurgadoss R <durgadoss.r@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
parent d0ac896a
...@@ -729,7 +729,6 @@ void intel_psr_flush(struct drm_device *dev, ...@@ -729,7 +729,6 @@ void intel_psr_flush(struct drm_device *dev,
struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private; struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
struct drm_crtc *crtc; struct drm_crtc *crtc;
enum pipe pipe; enum pipe pipe;
int delay_ms = HAS_DDI(dev) ? 100 : 500;
mutex_lock(&dev_priv->psr.lock); mutex_lock(&dev_priv->psr.lock);
if (!dev_priv->psr.enabled) { if (!dev_priv->psr.enabled) {
...@@ -766,7 +765,7 @@ void intel_psr_flush(struct drm_device *dev, ...@@ -766,7 +765,7 @@ void intel_psr_flush(struct drm_device *dev,
if (!dev_priv->psr.active && !dev_priv->psr.busy_frontbuffer_bits) if (!dev_priv->psr.active && !dev_priv->psr.busy_frontbuffer_bits)
if (!work_busy(&dev_priv->psr.work.work)) if (!work_busy(&dev_priv->psr.work.work))
schedule_delayed_work(&dev_priv->psr.work, schedule_delayed_work(&dev_priv->psr.work,
msecs_to_jiffies(delay_ms)); msecs_to_jiffies(100));
mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->psr.lock); mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->psr.lock);
} }
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment