Commit 224fa355 authored by Peter Zijlstra's avatar Peter Zijlstra

jump_label: Fix the fix, brown paper bags galore

Per the example of:

  !atomic_cmpxchg(&key->enabled, 0, 1)

the inverse was written as:

  atomic_cmpxchg(&key->enabled, 1, 0)

except of course, that while !old is only true for old == 0, old is
true for everything except old == 0.

Fix it to read:

  atomic_cmpxchg(&key->enabled, 1, 0) == 1

such that only the 1->0 transition returns true and goes on to disable
the keys.

Fixes: 83ab38ef ("jump_label: Fix concurrency issues in static_key_slow_dec()")
Reported-by: default avatarDarrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Tested-by: default avatarDarrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240731105557.GY33588@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net
parent 6623b021
......@@ -236,7 +236,7 @@ void static_key_disable_cpuslocked(struct static_key *key)
}
jump_label_lock();
if (atomic_cmpxchg(&key->enabled, 1, 0))
if (atomic_cmpxchg(&key->enabled, 1, 0) == 1)
jump_label_update(key);
jump_label_unlock();
}
......@@ -289,7 +289,7 @@ static void __static_key_slow_dec_cpuslocked(struct static_key *key)
return;
guard(mutex)(&jump_label_mutex);
if (atomic_cmpxchg(&key->enabled, 1, 0))
if (atomic_cmpxchg(&key->enabled, 1, 0) == 1)
jump_label_update(key);
else
WARN_ON_ONCE(!static_key_slow_try_dec(key));
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment