Commit 237ede16 authored by Srivatsa S. Bhat's avatar Srivatsa S. Bhat Committed by Rafael J. Wysocki

cpufreq: powernow-k6: Fix incorrect comparison with max_multipler

The value of 'max_multiplier' is meant to be used for comparison with
clock_ratio[index].driver_data, not the index itself! Fix the code in
powernow_k6_cpu_exit() that has this bug.

Also, while at it, make the for-loop condition look for CPUFREQ_TABLE_END,
instead of hard-coding the loop count to 8.
Reported-by: default avatarViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarSrivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: default avatarViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
parent 7aa0557f
...@@ -227,8 +227,9 @@ static int powernow_k6_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) ...@@ -227,8 +227,9 @@ static int powernow_k6_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
static int powernow_k6_cpu_exit(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) static int powernow_k6_cpu_exit(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
{ {
unsigned int i; unsigned int i;
for (i = 0; i < 8; i++) {
if (i == max_multiplier) for (i = 0; (clock_ratio[i].frequency != CPUFREQ_TABLE_END); i++) {
if (clock_ratio[i].driver_data == max_multiplier)
powernow_k6_target(policy, i); powernow_k6_target(policy, i);
} }
return 0; return 0;
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment