Commit 24e8ecff authored by Glauber Costa's avatar Glauber Costa Committed by Ingo Molnar

x86: split safe_smp_processor_id

This implementation in x86_64 is clean and consistent, but we
sacrifice it for the sake of being equal to i386 (since the other
way around would be harder).
Signed-off-by: default avatarGlauber Costa <gcosta@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
parent b23dab08
...@@ -27,12 +27,12 @@ static inline int num_booting_cpus(void) ...@@ -27,12 +27,12 @@ static inline int num_booting_cpus(void)
return cpus_weight(cpu_callout_map); return cpus_weight(cpu_callout_map);
} }
#define safe_smp_processor_id() smp_processor_id()
#else /* CONFIG_SMP */ #else /* CONFIG_SMP */
#define stack_smp_processor_id() 0 #define stack_smp_processor_id() 0
#define safe_smp_processor_id() 0
#endif /* !CONFIG_SMP */ #endif /* !CONFIG_SMP */
#define safe_smp_processor_id() smp_processor_id()
#endif #endif
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment