Commit 260db43c authored by Randy Dunlap's avatar Randy Dunlap Committed by David Sterba

btrfs: delete duplicated words + other fixes in comments

Delete repeated words in fs/btrfs/.
{to, the, a, and old}
and change "into 2 part" to "into 2 parts".
Reviewed-by: default avatarNikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarRandy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: default avatarDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
parent 437490fe
......@@ -2785,7 +2785,7 @@ int btrfs_write_dirty_block_groups(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans)
* finished yet (no block group item in the extent tree
* yet, etc). If this is the case, wait for all free
* space endio workers to finish and retry. This is a
* a very rare case so no need for a more efficient and
* very rare case so no need for a more efficient and
* complex approach.
*/
if (ret == -ENOENT) {
......
......@@ -5115,7 +5115,7 @@ int btrfs_search_forward(struct btrfs_root *root, struct btrfs_key *min_key,
slot--;
/*
* check this node pointer against the min_trans parameters.
* If it is too old, old, skip to the next one.
* If it is too old, skip to the next one.
*/
while (slot < nritems) {
u64 gen;
......
......@@ -2928,7 +2928,7 @@ int __cold open_ctree(struct super_block *sb, struct btrfs_fs_devices *fs_device
}
/*
* Verify the type first, if that or the the checksum value are
* Verify the type first, if that or the checksum value are
* corrupted, we'll find out
*/
csum_type = btrfs_super_csum_type(disk_super);
......
......@@ -3241,7 +3241,7 @@ static int __do_readpage(struct page *page,
/*
* If we have a file range that points to a compressed extent
* and it's followed by a consecutive file range that points to
* and it's followed by a consecutive file range that points
* to the same compressed extent (possibly with a different
* offset and/or length, so it either points to the whole extent
* or only part of it), we must make sure we do not submit a
......
......@@ -1353,7 +1353,7 @@ static int __btrfs_write_out_cache(struct btrfs_root *root, struct inode *inode,
/*
* at this point the pages are under IO and we're happy,
* The caller is responsible for waiting on them and updating the
* The caller is responsible for waiting on them and updating
* the cache and the inode
*/
io_ctl->entries = entries;
......
......@@ -2315,7 +2315,7 @@ static int qgroup_update_refcnt(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
* Update qgroup rfer/excl counters.
* Rfer update is easy, codes can explain themselves.
*
* Excl update is tricky, the update is split into 2 part.
* Excl update is tricky, the update is split into 2 parts.
* Part 1: Possible exclusive <-> sharing detect:
* | A | !A |
* -------------------------------------
......
......@@ -4883,7 +4883,7 @@ static int log_conflicting_inodes(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
* Check the inode's logged_trans only instead of
* btrfs_inode_in_log(). This is because the last_log_commit of
* the inode is not updated when we only log that it exists and
* and it has the full sync bit set (see btrfs_log_inode()).
* it has the full sync bit set (see btrfs_log_inode()).
*/
if (BTRFS_I(inode)->logged_trans == trans->transid) {
spin_unlock(&BTRFS_I(inode)->lock);
......@@ -6380,7 +6380,7 @@ void btrfs_record_snapshot_destroy(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
* committed by the caller, and BTRFS_DONT_NEED_TRANS_COMMIT
* otherwise.
* When false: returns BTRFS_DONT_NEED_LOG_SYNC if the caller does not need to
* to sync the log, BTRFS_NEED_LOG_SYNC if it needs to sync the log,
* sync the log, BTRFS_NEED_LOG_SYNC if it needs to sync the log,
* or BTRFS_NEED_TRANS_COMMIT if the transaction needs to be
* committed (without attempting to sync the log).
*/
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment