Commit 281e4eab authored by Russell King's avatar Russell King Committed by David S. Miller

net: sfp: rename sm_retries

Rename sm_retries as sm_fault_retries, as this is what this member is
tracking.
Signed-off-by: default avatarRussell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>
Reviewed-by: default avatarAndrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
parent 65ef2d5c
......@@ -234,7 +234,7 @@ struct sfp {
unsigned char sm_mod_tries;
unsigned char sm_dev_state;
unsigned short sm_state;
unsigned int sm_retries;
unsigned char sm_fault_retries;
struct sfp_eeprom_id id;
unsigned int module_power_mW;
......@@ -1490,7 +1490,7 @@ static bool sfp_los_event_inactive(struct sfp *sfp, unsigned int event)
static void sfp_sm_fault(struct sfp *sfp, unsigned int next_state, bool warn)
{
if (sfp->sm_retries && !--sfp->sm_retries) {
if (sfp->sm_fault_retries && !--sfp->sm_fault_retries) {
dev_err(sfp->dev,
"module persistently indicates fault, disabling\n");
sfp_sm_next(sfp, SFP_S_TX_DISABLE, 0);
......@@ -1893,7 +1893,7 @@ static void sfp_sm_main(struct sfp *sfp, unsigned int event)
sfp_module_tx_enable(sfp);
/* Initialise the fault clearance retries */
sfp->sm_retries = N_FAULT_INIT;
sfp->sm_fault_retries = N_FAULT_INIT;
/* We need to check the TX_FAULT state, which is not defined
* while TX_DISABLE is asserted. The earliest we want to do
......@@ -1933,7 +1933,7 @@ static void sfp_sm_main(struct sfp *sfp, unsigned int event)
* or t_start_up, so assume there is a fault.
*/
sfp_sm_fault(sfp, SFP_S_INIT_TX_FAULT,
sfp->sm_retries == N_FAULT_INIT);
sfp->sm_fault_retries == N_FAULT_INIT);
} else if (event == SFP_E_TIMEOUT || event == SFP_E_TX_CLEAR) {
init_done: /* TX_FAULT deasserted or we timed out with TX_FAULT
* clear. Probe for the PHY and check the LOS state.
......@@ -1946,7 +1946,7 @@ static void sfp_sm_main(struct sfp *sfp, unsigned int event)
sfp_sm_link_check_los(sfp);
/* Reset the fault retry count */
sfp->sm_retries = N_FAULT;
sfp->sm_fault_retries = N_FAULT;
}
break;
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment