Commit 29abfd4e authored by Kenneth Graunke's avatar Kenneth Graunke Committed by Greg Kroah-Hartman

drm/i915: Drop support for I915_EXEC_CONSTANTS_* execbuf parameters.

commit 0f5418e5 upstream.

This patch makes the I915_PARAM_HAS_EXEC_CONSTANTS getparam return 0
(indicating the optional feature is not supported), and makes execbuf
always return -EINVAL if the flags are used.

Apparently, no userspace ever shipped which used this optional feature:
I checked the git history of Mesa, xf86-video-intel, libva, and Beignet,
and there were zero commits showing a use of these flags.  Kernel commit
72bfa19c apparently introduced the feature prematurely.  According
to Chris, the intention was to use this in cairo-drm, but "the use was
broken for gen6", so I don't think it ever happened.

'relative_constants_mode' has always been tracked per-device, but this
has actually been wrong ever since hardware contexts were introduced, as
the INSTPM register is saved (and automatically restored) as part of the
render ring context. The software per-device value could therefore get
out of sync with the hardware per-context value.  This meant that using
them is actually unsafe: a client which tried to use them could damage
the state of other clients, causing the GPU to interpret their BO
offsets as absolute pointers, leading to bogus memory reads.

These flags were also never ported to execlist mode, making them no-ops
on Gen9+ (which requires execlists), and Gen8 in the default mode.

On Gen8+, userspace can write these registers directly, achieving the
same effect.  On Gen6-7.5, it likely makes sense to extend the command
parser to support them.  I don't think anyone wants this on Gen4-5.

Based on a patch by Dave Gordon.

v3: Return -ENODEV for the getparam, as this is what we do for other
    obsolete features.  Suggested by Chris Wilson.

Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92448Signed-off-by: default avatarKenneth Graunke <kenneth@whitecape.org>
Reviewed-by: default avatarJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20170215093446.21291-1-kenneth@whitecape.orgAcked-by: default avatarDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Signed-off-by: default avatarChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20170313170433.26843-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
(cherry picked from commit ef0f411f)
Signed-off-by: default avatarJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
parent b364cf79
......@@ -248,6 +248,7 @@ static int i915_getparam(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
case I915_PARAM_IRQ_ACTIVE:
case I915_PARAM_ALLOW_BATCHBUFFER:
case I915_PARAM_LAST_DISPATCH:
case I915_PARAM_HAS_EXEC_CONSTANTS:
/* Reject all old ums/dri params. */
return -ENODEV;
case I915_PARAM_CHIPSET_ID:
......@@ -274,9 +275,6 @@ static int i915_getparam(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
case I915_PARAM_HAS_BSD2:
value = !!dev_priv->engine[VCS2];
break;
case I915_PARAM_HAS_EXEC_CONSTANTS:
value = INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 4;
break;
case I915_PARAM_HAS_LLC:
value = HAS_LLC(dev_priv);
break;
......
......@@ -1805,8 +1805,6 @@ struct drm_i915_private {
const struct intel_device_info info;
int relative_constants_mode;
void __iomem *regs;
struct intel_uncore uncore;
......
......@@ -4567,8 +4567,6 @@ i915_gem_load_init(struct drm_device *dev)
init_waitqueue_head(&dev_priv->gpu_error.wait_queue);
init_waitqueue_head(&dev_priv->gpu_error.reset_queue);
dev_priv->relative_constants_mode = I915_EXEC_CONSTANTS_REL_GENERAL;
init_waitqueue_head(&dev_priv->pending_flip_queue);
dev_priv->mm.interruptible = true;
......
......@@ -1410,10 +1410,7 @@ execbuf_submit(struct i915_execbuffer_params *params,
struct drm_i915_gem_execbuffer2 *args,
struct list_head *vmas)
{
struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = params->request->i915;
u64 exec_start, exec_len;
int instp_mode;
u32 instp_mask;
int ret;
ret = i915_gem_execbuffer_move_to_gpu(params->request, vmas);
......@@ -1424,56 +1421,11 @@ execbuf_submit(struct i915_execbuffer_params *params,
if (ret)
return ret;
instp_mode = args->flags & I915_EXEC_CONSTANTS_MASK;
instp_mask = I915_EXEC_CONSTANTS_MASK;
switch (instp_mode) {
case I915_EXEC_CONSTANTS_REL_GENERAL:
case I915_EXEC_CONSTANTS_ABSOLUTE:
case I915_EXEC_CONSTANTS_REL_SURFACE:
if (instp_mode != 0 && params->engine->id != RCS) {
DRM_DEBUG("non-0 rel constants mode on non-RCS\n");
return -EINVAL;
}
if (instp_mode != dev_priv->relative_constants_mode) {
if (INTEL_INFO(dev_priv)->gen < 4) {
DRM_DEBUG("no rel constants on pre-gen4\n");
return -EINVAL;
}
if (INTEL_INFO(dev_priv)->gen > 5 &&
instp_mode == I915_EXEC_CONSTANTS_REL_SURFACE) {
DRM_DEBUG("rel surface constants mode invalid on gen5+\n");
return -EINVAL;
}
/* The HW changed the meaning on this bit on gen6 */
if (INTEL_INFO(dev_priv)->gen >= 6)
instp_mask &= ~I915_EXEC_CONSTANTS_REL_SURFACE;
}
break;
default:
DRM_DEBUG("execbuf with unknown constants: %d\n", instp_mode);
if (args->flags & I915_EXEC_CONSTANTS_MASK) {
DRM_DEBUG("I915_EXEC_CONSTANTS_* unsupported\n");
return -EINVAL;
}
if (params->engine->id == RCS &&
instp_mode != dev_priv->relative_constants_mode) {
struct intel_ring *ring = params->request->ring;
ret = intel_ring_begin(params->request, 4);
if (ret)
return ret;
intel_ring_emit(ring, MI_NOOP);
intel_ring_emit(ring, MI_LOAD_REGISTER_IMM(1));
intel_ring_emit_reg(ring, INSTPM);
intel_ring_emit(ring, instp_mask << 16 | instp_mode);
intel_ring_advance(ring);
dev_priv->relative_constants_mode = instp_mode;
}
if (args->flags & I915_EXEC_GEN7_SOL_RESET) {
ret = i915_reset_gen7_sol_offsets(params->request);
if (ret)
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment