Commit 2bea8df0 authored by Darrick J. Wong's avatar Darrick J. Wong

xfs: always scrub record/key order of interior records

In commit d47fef93, we removed the firstrec and firstkey fields of
struct xchk_btree because Christoph thought they were unnecessary
because we could use the record index in the btree cursor.  This is
incorrect because bc_ptrs (now bc_levels[].ptr) tracks the cursor
position within a specific btree block, not within the entire level.

The end result is that scrub no longer detects situations where the
rightmost record of a block is identical to the leftmost record of that
block's right sibling.  Fix this regression by reintroducing record
validity booleans so that order checking skips *only* the leftmost
record/key in each level.

Fixes: d47fef93 ("xfs: don't track firstrec/firstkey separately in xchk_btree")
Signed-off-by: default avatarDarrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: default avatarDave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
parent c99f99fa
......@@ -151,11 +151,12 @@ xchk_btree_rec(
trace_xchk_btree_rec(bs->sc, cur, 0);
/* If this isn't the first record, are they in order? */
if (cur->bc_levels[0].ptr > 1 &&
/* Are all records across all record blocks in order? */
if (bs->lastrec_valid &&
!cur->bc_ops->recs_inorder(cur, &bs->lastrec, rec))
xchk_btree_set_corrupt(bs->sc, cur, 0);
memcpy(&bs->lastrec, rec, cur->bc_ops->rec_len);
bs->lastrec_valid = true;
if (cur->bc_nlevels == 1)
return;
......@@ -198,11 +199,12 @@ xchk_btree_key(
trace_xchk_btree_key(bs->sc, cur, level);
/* If this isn't the first key, are they in order? */
if (cur->bc_levels[level].ptr > 1 &&
!cur->bc_ops->keys_inorder(cur, &bs->lastkey[level - 1], key))
/* Are all low keys across all node blocks in order? */
if (bs->lastkey[level - 1].valid &&
!cur->bc_ops->keys_inorder(cur, &bs->lastkey[level - 1].key, key))
xchk_btree_set_corrupt(bs->sc, cur, level);
memcpy(&bs->lastkey[level - 1], key, cur->bc_ops->key_len);
memcpy(&bs->lastkey[level - 1].key, key, cur->bc_ops->key_len);
bs->lastkey[level - 1].valid = true;
if (level + 1 >= cur->bc_nlevels)
return;
......
......@@ -31,6 +31,11 @@ typedef int (*xchk_btree_rec_fn)(
struct xchk_btree *bs,
const union xfs_btree_rec *rec);
struct xchk_btree_key {
union xfs_btree_key key;
bool valid;
};
struct xchk_btree {
/* caller-provided scrub state */
struct xfs_scrub *sc;
......@@ -40,11 +45,12 @@ struct xchk_btree {
void *private;
/* internal scrub state */
bool lastrec_valid;
union xfs_btree_rec lastrec;
struct list_head to_check;
/* this element must come last! */
union xfs_btree_key lastkey[];
struct xchk_btree_key lastkey[];
};
/*
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment