Commit 2e2d53da authored by Jiada Wang's avatar Jiada Wang Committed by Mark Brown

ASoC: rsnd: ssi: remove unnesessary period_pos

period_pos can always be calculated by byte_pos and
byte_per_period, there is no reason to maintain this
variable in rsnd_dai_stream.

This patch removes period_pos from rsnd_ssi and calculates
next_period_byte with consideration of actual byte_pos value.
Signed-off-by: default avatarJiada Wang <jiada_wang@mentor.com>
Acked-by: default avatarKuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarMark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
parent c046010a
......@@ -80,7 +80,6 @@ struct rsnd_ssi {
unsigned int usrcnt;
int byte_pos;
int period_pos;
int byte_per_period;
int next_period_byte;
};
......@@ -421,7 +420,6 @@ static void rsnd_ssi_pointer_init(struct rsnd_mod *mod,
struct snd_pcm_runtime *runtime = rsnd_io_to_runtime(io);
ssi->byte_pos = 0;
ssi->period_pos = 0;
ssi->byte_per_period = runtime->period_size *
runtime->channels *
samples_to_bytes(runtime, 1);
......@@ -453,13 +451,12 @@ static bool rsnd_ssi_pointer_update(struct rsnd_mod *mod,
if (byte_pos >= ssi->next_period_byte) {
struct snd_pcm_runtime *runtime = rsnd_io_to_runtime(io);
int period_pos = byte_pos / ssi->byte_per_period;
ssi->period_pos++;
ssi->next_period_byte += ssi->byte_per_period;
ssi->next_period_byte = (period_pos + 1) * ssi->byte_per_period;
if (ssi->period_pos >= runtime->periods) {
if (period_pos >= runtime->periods) {
byte_pos = 0;
ssi->period_pos = 0;
ssi->next_period_byte = ssi->byte_per_period;
}
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment