Commit 2ee788c0 authored by Maciej Fijalkowski's avatar Maciej Fijalkowski Committed by Alexei Starovoitov

ice: remove redundant xdp_rxq_info registration

xdp_rxq_info struct can be registered by drivers via two functions -
xdp_rxq_info_reg() and __xdp_rxq_info_reg(). The latter one allows
drivers that support XDP multi-buffer to set up xdp_rxq_info::frag_size
which in turn will make it possible to grow the packet via
bpf_xdp_adjust_tail() BPF helper.

Currently, ice registers xdp_rxq_info in two spots:
1) ice_setup_rx_ring() // via xdp_rxq_info_reg(), BUG
2) ice_vsi_cfg_rxq()   // via __xdp_rxq_info_reg(), OK

Cited commit under fixes tag took care of setting up frag_size and
updated registration scheme in 2) but it did not help as
1) is called before 2) and as shown above it uses old registration
function. This means that 2) sees that xdp_rxq_info is already
registered and never calls __xdp_rxq_info_reg() which leaves us with
xdp_rxq_info::frag_size being set to 0.

To fix this misbehavior, simply remove xdp_rxq_info_reg() call from
ice_setup_rx_ring().

Fixes: 2fba7dc5 ("ice: Add support for XDP multi-buffer on Rx side")
Acked-by: default avatarMagnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarMaciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240124191602.566724-7-maciej.fijalkowski@intel.comSigned-off-by: default avatarAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
parent 83014323
...@@ -513,11 +513,6 @@ int ice_setup_rx_ring(struct ice_rx_ring *rx_ring) ...@@ -513,11 +513,6 @@ int ice_setup_rx_ring(struct ice_rx_ring *rx_ring)
if (ice_is_xdp_ena_vsi(rx_ring->vsi)) if (ice_is_xdp_ena_vsi(rx_ring->vsi))
WRITE_ONCE(rx_ring->xdp_prog, rx_ring->vsi->xdp_prog); WRITE_ONCE(rx_ring->xdp_prog, rx_ring->vsi->xdp_prog);
if (rx_ring->vsi->type == ICE_VSI_PF &&
!xdp_rxq_info_is_reg(&rx_ring->xdp_rxq))
if (xdp_rxq_info_reg(&rx_ring->xdp_rxq, rx_ring->netdev,
rx_ring->q_index, rx_ring->q_vector->napi.napi_id))
goto err;
return 0; return 0;
err: err:
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment