mtd: fsl_elbc_nand: remove unnecessary badblock_pattern

Since the introduction of nand_create_default_bbt_descr() (now known as
nand_create_badblock_pattern()) in

  commit 58373ff0

nand_chip.badblock_pattern will be dynamically calculated to the same
1-byte-length pattern that is required by fsl_elbc_nand. This custom
badblock_pattern is no longer needed, then, and its removal may help
facilitate further nand_bbt.c/nand_base.c cleanup in the future (one
down, many to go?)

Anyway, with nand_bbt.c fixed, this effectively reverts:

  commit 452db272
  [MTD] [NAND] fsl_elbc_nand: fix OOB workability for large page NAND chips
Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>
Cc: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com>

drivers/mtd/nand/fsl_elbc_nand.c

@@ -108,20 +108,6 @@ static struct nand_ecclayout fsl_elbc_oob_lp_eccm1 = {
 	.oobfree = { {1, 7}, {11, 13}, {27, 13}, {43, 13}, {59, 5} },
 };
 
-/*
- * fsl_elbc_oob_lp_eccm* specify that LP NAND's OOB free area starts at offset
- * 1, so we have to adjust bad block pattern. This pattern should be used for
- * x8 chips only. So far hardware does not support x16 chips anyway.
- */
-static u8 scan_ff_pattern[] = { 0xff, };
-
-static struct nand_bbt_descr largepage_memorybased = {
-	.options = 0,
-	.offs = 0,
-	.len = 1,
-	.pattern = scan_ff_pattern,
-};
-
 /*
  * ELBC may use HW ECC, so that OOB offsets, that NAND core uses for bbt,
  * interfere with ECC positions, that's why we implement our own descriptors.
@@ -699,7 +685,6 @@ static int fsl_elbc_chip_init_tail(struct mtd_info *mtd)
 			chip->ecc.layout = (priv->fmr & FMR_ECCM) ?
 			                   &fsl_elbc_oob_lp_eccm1 :
 			                   &fsl_elbc_oob_lp_eccm0;
-			chip->badblock_pattern = &largepage_memorybased;
 		}
 	} else {
 		dev_err(priv->dev,