net/sched: flower: Fix wrong handle assignment during filter change
Commit 08a0063d ("net/sched: flower: Move filter handle initialization earlier") moved filter handle initialization but an assignment of the handle to fnew->handle is done regardless of fold value. This is wrong because if fold != NULL (so fold->handle == handle) no new handle is allocated and passed handle is assigned to fnew->handle. Then if any subsequent action in fl_change() fails then the handle value is removed from IDR that is incorrect as we will have still valid old filter instance with handle that is not present in IDR. Fix this issue by moving the assignment so it is done only when passed fold == NULL. Prior the patch: [root@machine tc-testing]# ./tdc.py -d enp1s0f0np0 -e 14be Test 14be: Concurrently replace same range of 100k flower filters from 10 tc instances exit: 123 exit: 0 RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument We have an error talking to the kernel Command failed tmp/replace_6:1885 All test results: 1..1 not ok 1 14be - Concurrently replace same range of 100k flower filters from 10 tc instances Command exited with 123, expected 0 RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument We have an error talking to the kernel Command failed tmp/replace_6:1885 After the patch: [root@machine tc-testing]# ./tdc.py -d enp1s0f0np0 -e 14be Test 14be: Concurrently replace same range of 100k flower filters from 10 tc instances All test results: 1..1 ok 1 14be - Concurrently replace same range of 100k flower filters from 10 tc instances Fixes: 08a0063d ("net/sched: flower: Move filter handle initialization earlier") Signed-off-by: Ivan Vecera <ivecera@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <simon.horman@corigine.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230425140604.169881-1-ivecera@redhat.comSigned-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Showing
Please register or sign in to comment