[SCSI] scsi_transport_fc: Protect against overflow in dev_loss_tmo
The rport structure defines dev_loss_tmo as u32, which is later multiplied with HZ to get the actual timeout value. This might overflow for large dev_loss_tmo values. So we should be better using u64 as intermediate variables here to protect against overflow. Signed-off-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de> Acked-by: James Smart <james.smart@emulex.com> Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@suse.de>
Showing
Please register or sign in to comment