Commit 371528ca authored by Anton Vorontsov's avatar Anton Vorontsov Committed by Linus Torvalds

mm: memcg: Correct unregistring of events attached to the same eventfd

There is an issue when memcg unregisters events that were attached to
the same eventfd:

- On the first call mem_cgroup_usage_unregister_event() removes all
  events attached to a given eventfd, and if there were no events left,
  thresholds->primary would become NULL;

- Since there were several events registered, cgroups core will call
  mem_cgroup_usage_unregister_event() again, but now kernel will oops,
  as the function doesn't expect that threshold->primary may be NULL.

That's a good question whether mem_cgroup_usage_unregister_event()
should actually remove all events in one go, but nowadays it can't
do any better as cftype->unregister_event callback doesn't pass
any private event-associated cookie. So, let's fix the issue by
simply checking for threshold->primary.

FWIW, w/o the patch the following oops may be observed:

 BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000004
 IP: [<ffffffff810be32c>] mem_cgroup_usage_unregister_event+0x9c/0x1f0
 Pid: 574, comm: kworker/0:2 Not tainted 3.3.0-rc4+ #9 Bochs Bochs
 RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff810be32c>]  [<ffffffff810be32c>] mem_cgroup_usage_unregister_event+0x9c/0x1f0
 RSP: 0018:ffff88001d0b9d60  EFLAGS: 00010246
 Process kworker/0:2 (pid: 574, threadinfo ffff88001d0b8000, task ffff88001de91cc0)
 Call Trace:
  [<ffffffff8107092b>] cgroup_event_remove+0x2b/0x60
  [<ffffffff8103db94>] process_one_work+0x174/0x450
  [<ffffffff8103e413>] worker_thread+0x123/0x2d0

Cc: stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarAnton Vorontsov <anton.vorontsov@linaro.org>
Acked-by: default avatarKAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill@shutemov.name>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: default avatarLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
parent 37fbf4bf
...@@ -4414,6 +4414,9 @@ static void mem_cgroup_usage_unregister_event(struct cgroup *cgrp, ...@@ -4414,6 +4414,9 @@ static void mem_cgroup_usage_unregister_event(struct cgroup *cgrp,
*/ */
BUG_ON(!thresholds); BUG_ON(!thresholds);
if (!thresholds->primary)
goto unlock;
usage = mem_cgroup_usage(memcg, type == _MEMSWAP); usage = mem_cgroup_usage(memcg, type == _MEMSWAP);
/* Check if a threshold crossed before removing */ /* Check if a threshold crossed before removing */
...@@ -4462,7 +4465,7 @@ static void mem_cgroup_usage_unregister_event(struct cgroup *cgrp, ...@@ -4462,7 +4465,7 @@ static void mem_cgroup_usage_unregister_event(struct cgroup *cgrp,
/* To be sure that nobody uses thresholds */ /* To be sure that nobody uses thresholds */
synchronize_rcu(); synchronize_rcu();
unlock:
mutex_unlock(&memcg->thresholds_lock); mutex_unlock(&memcg->thresholds_lock);
} }
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment