Commit 3dd730f2 authored by Stephen Rothwell's avatar Stephen Rothwell Committed by Linus Torvalds

cpumask: statement expressions confuse some versions of gcc

when you take the address of the result.  Noticed on a sparc64 compile
using a version 3.4.5 cross compiler.

 kernel/time/tick-common.c: In function `tick_check_new_device':
 kernel/time/tick-common.c:210: error: invalid lvalue in unary `&'
 ...

Just make it a regular expression.
Signed-off-by: default avatarStephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Acked-by: default avatarIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Signed-off-by: default avatarLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
parent a4319d9f
...@@ -287,7 +287,7 @@ static inline const cpumask_t *get_cpu_mask(unsigned int cpu) ...@@ -287,7 +287,7 @@ static inline const cpumask_t *get_cpu_mask(unsigned int cpu)
* gcc optimizes it out (it's a constant) and there's no huge stack * gcc optimizes it out (it's a constant) and there's no huge stack
* variable created: * variable created:
*/ */
#define cpumask_of_cpu(cpu) ({ *get_cpu_mask(cpu); }) #define cpumask_of_cpu(cpu) (*get_cpu_mask(cpu))
#define CPU_MASK_LAST_WORD BITMAP_LAST_WORD_MASK(NR_CPUS) #define CPU_MASK_LAST_WORD BITMAP_LAST_WORD_MASK(NR_CPUS)
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment