Commit 3e050924 authored by KOSAKI Motohiro's avatar KOSAKI Motohiro Committed by Greg Kroah-Hartman

alarmtimer: return EINVAL instead of ENOTSUPP if rtcdev doesn't exist

commit 98d6f4dd upstream.

Fedora Ruby maintainer reported latest Ruby doesn't work on Fedora Rawhide
on ARM. (http://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/9008)

Because of, commit 1c6b39ad (alarmtimers: Return -ENOTSUPP if no
RTC device is present) intruduced to return ENOTSUPP when
clock_get{time,res} can't find a RTC device. However this is incorrect.

First, ENOTSUPP isn't exported to userland (ENOTSUP or EOPNOTSUP are the
closest userland equivlents).

Second, Posix and Linux man pages agree that clock_gettime and
clock_getres should return EINVAL if clk_id argument is invalid.
While the arugment that the clockid is valid, but just not supported
on this hardware could be made, this is just a technicality that
doesn't help userspace applicaitons, and only complicates error
handling.

Thus, this patch changes the code to use EINVAL.

Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Reported-by: default avatarVit Ondruch <v.ondruch@tiscali.cz>
Signed-off-by: default avatarKOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
[jstultz: Tweaks to commit message to include full rational]
Signed-off-by: default avatarJohn Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
parent 664eaaa2
......@@ -474,7 +474,7 @@ static int alarm_clock_getres(const clockid_t which_clock, struct timespec *tp)
clockid_t baseid = alarm_bases[clock2alarm(which_clock)].base_clockid;
if (!alarmtimer_get_rtcdev())
return -ENOTSUPP;
return -EINVAL;
return hrtimer_get_res(baseid, tp);
}
......@@ -491,7 +491,7 @@ static int alarm_clock_get(clockid_t which_clock, struct timespec *tp)
struct alarm_base *base = &alarm_bases[clock2alarm(which_clock)];
if (!alarmtimer_get_rtcdev())
return -ENOTSUPP;
return -EINVAL;
*tp = ktime_to_timespec(base->gettime());
return 0;
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment