perf trace: Do not process PERF_RECORD_LOST twice

We catch this record to provide a visual indication that events are
getting lost, then call the default method to allow extra logging shared
with the other tools to take place.

This extra logging was done twice because we were continuing to the
"default" clause where machine__process_event() will end up calling
machine__process_lost_event() again, fix it.

Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Cc: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Wang Nan <wangnan0@huawei.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-wus2zlhw3qo24ye84ewu4aqw@git.kernel.orgSigned-off-by: default avatarArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
parent d1b26c70
...@@ -1618,6 +1618,7 @@ static int trace__process_event(struct trace *trace, struct machine *machine, ...@@ -1618,6 +1618,7 @@ static int trace__process_event(struct trace *trace, struct machine *machine,
color_fprintf(trace->output, PERF_COLOR_RED, color_fprintf(trace->output, PERF_COLOR_RED,
"LOST %" PRIu64 " events!\n", event->lost.lost); "LOST %" PRIu64 " events!\n", event->lost.lost);
ret = machine__process_lost_event(machine, event, sample); ret = machine__process_lost_event(machine, event, sample);
break;
default: default:
ret = machine__process_event(machine, event, sample); ret = machine__process_event(machine, event, sample);
break; break;
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment