Commit 3eddcc93 authored by Ira Weiny's avatar Ira Weiny Committed by Dan Williams

cxl/pci: Create PCI DOE mailbox's for memory devices

DOE mailbox objects will be needed for various mailbox communications
with each memory device.

Iterate each DOE mailbox capability and create PCI DOE mailbox objects
as found.

It is not anticipated that this is the final resting place for the
iteration of the DOE devices.  The support of switch ports will drive
this code into the PCIe side.  In this imagined architecture the CXL
port driver would then query into the PCI device for the DOE mailbox
array.

For now creating the mailboxes in the CXL port is good enough for the
endpoints.  Later PCIe ports will need to support this to support switch
ports more generically.

Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
Cc: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
Reviewed-by: default avatarJonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarIra Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220719205249.566684-5-ira.weiny@intel.comSigned-off-by: default avatarDan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
parent 9d24322e
......@@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
menuconfig CXL_BUS
tristate "CXL (Compute Express Link) Devices Support"
depends on PCI
select PCI_DOE
help
CXL is a bus that is electrically compatible with PCI Express, but
layers three protocols on that signalling (CXL.io, CXL.cache, and
......
......@@ -192,6 +192,7 @@ struct cxl_endpoint_dvsec_info {
* @component_reg_phys: register base of component registers
* @info: Cached DVSEC information about the device.
* @serial: PCIe Device Serial Number
* @doe_mbs: PCI DOE mailbox array
* @mbox_send: @dev specific transport for transmitting mailbox commands
*
* See section 8.2.9.5.2 Capacity Configuration and Label Storage for
......@@ -226,6 +227,8 @@ struct cxl_dev_state {
resource_size_t component_reg_phys;
u64 serial;
struct xarray doe_mbs;
int (*mbox_send)(struct cxl_dev_state *cxlds, struct cxl_mbox_cmd *cmd);
};
......
......@@ -8,6 +8,7 @@
#include <linux/mutex.h>
#include <linux/list.h>
#include <linux/pci.h>
#include <linux/pci-doe.h>
#include <linux/io.h>
#include "cxlmem.h"
#include "cxlpci.h"
......@@ -386,6 +387,47 @@ static int cxl_setup_regs(struct pci_dev *pdev, enum cxl_regloc_type type,
return rc;
}
static void cxl_pci_destroy_doe(void *mbs)
{
xa_destroy(mbs);
}
static void devm_cxl_pci_create_doe(struct cxl_dev_state *cxlds)
{
struct device *dev = cxlds->dev;
struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(dev);
u16 off = 0;
xa_init(&cxlds->doe_mbs);
if (devm_add_action(&pdev->dev, cxl_pci_destroy_doe, &cxlds->doe_mbs)) {
dev_err(dev, "Failed to create XArray for DOE's\n");
return;
}
/*
* Mailbox creation is best effort. Higher layers must determine if
* the lack of a mailbox for their protocol is a device failure or not.
*/
pci_doe_for_each_off(pdev, off) {
struct pci_doe_mb *doe_mb;
doe_mb = pcim_doe_create_mb(pdev, off);
if (IS_ERR(doe_mb)) {
dev_err(dev, "Failed to create MB object for MB @ %x\n",
off);
continue;
}
if (xa_insert(&cxlds->doe_mbs, off, doe_mb, GFP_KERNEL)) {
dev_err(dev, "xa_insert failed to insert MB @ %x\n",
off);
continue;
}
dev_dbg(dev, "Created DOE mailbox @%x\n", off);
}
}
static int cxl_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *id)
{
struct cxl_register_map map;
......@@ -434,6 +476,8 @@ static int cxl_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *id)
cxlds->component_reg_phys = cxl_regmap_to_base(pdev, &map);
devm_cxl_pci_create_doe(cxlds);
rc = cxl_pci_setup_mailbox(cxlds);
if (rc)
return rc;
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment