Commit 43e8149d authored by Filipe Manana's avatar Filipe Manana Committed by Sasha Levin

Btrfs: fix inode eviction infinite loop after extent_same ioctl

[ Upstream commit HEAD ]

commit 113e8283 upstream.

If we pass a length of 0 to the extent_same ioctl, we end up locking an
extent range with a start offset greater then its end offset (if the
destination file's offset is greater than zero). This results in a warning
from extent_io.c:insert_state through the following call chain:

  btrfs_extent_same()
    btrfs_double_lock()
      lock_extent_range()
        lock_extent(inode->io_tree, offset, offset + len - 1)
          lock_extent_bits()
            __set_extent_bit()
              insert_state()
                --> WARN_ON(end < start)

This leads to an infinite loop when evicting the inode. This is the same
problem that my previous patch titled
"Btrfs: fix inode eviction infinite loop after cloning into it" addressed
but for the extent_same ioctl instead of the clone ioctl.
Signed-off-by: default avatarFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarOmar Sandoval <osandov@osandov.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

(cherry picked from commit 9dc10661)
Signed-off-by: default avatarSasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com>
parent d5454242
......@@ -2925,6 +2925,9 @@ static int btrfs_extent_same(struct inode *src, u64 loff, u64 len,
if (src == dst)
return -EINVAL;
if (len == 0)
return 0;
btrfs_double_lock(src, loff, dst, dst_loff, len);
ret = extent_same_check_offsets(src, loff, len);
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment